EPIC Alert 17.25
======================================================================= E P I C A l e r t ======================================================================= Volume 17.25 December 17, 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Published by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) Washington, D.C. http://www.epic.org/alert/epic_alert_1725.html "Defend Privacy. Support EPIC." http://epic.org/donate Report All Screening Experiences at EPIC Body Scanner Incident Report http://epic.org/bodyscanner/incident_report/ ======================================================================= Table of Contents ======================================================================= [1] U.S. Government Pressures Companies to Cut Off Wikileaks [2] EPIC Submits Comments on DHS Fusion Center Proposals [3] Congress, FTC Privacy Report Examine Possibilities of Do Not Track [4] Briefing Schedule Announced in EPIC v. DHS, the Body Scanners Case [5] Google's Street View Practices Face Continued Legal Scrutiny [6] News in Brief [7] EPIC's Holiday Wish List: Gift Ideas [8] Upcoming Conferences and Events TAKE ACTION: Stop Airport Strip Searches! - JOIN Facebook Group "Stop Airport Strip Searches" and INVITE Friends - DISPLAY the IMAGE http://thepublicvoice.org/nakedmachine.jpg - SUPPORT EPIC http://www.epic.org/donate/ ======================================================================= [1] U.S. Government Pressures Companies to Cut Off Wikileaks ======================================================================= The release of thousands of leaked diplomatic cables by WIkileaks has prompted the United States government to pressure Internet companies to discontinue hosting and donation services for the organization. Wikileaks allegedly obtained over 250,000 cables after they were leaked by a member of the United States military. The cables contain details about controversial activities of United States diplomats and corporations overseas. After pressure from the United State's officials, including Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CN), companies such as Amazon and Tableau stopped hosting the Wikileaks documents. Financial companies, including Visa, Mastercard, and Paypal also bowed to government pressure and cut off Internet users' ability to donate to Wikileaks. In response to Internet companies' decision to cut off hosting and donation services for Wikileaks, a large, disbursed group of hackers, calling themselves "Anonymous"; launched a series of "Denial of Service" attacks on sites such as Mastercard and Amazon. Anonymous, which is unaffiliated with Wikileaks, dubbed the attacks "Operation: Payback" and vowed to target websites of any company that tried to censor Wikileaks. In light of the government's action, EPIC has submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to several government agencies to determine whether confidential donor information was improperly released by Visa, Mastercard, or Paypal. This information concerns First Amendment protected activity and its disclosure to the government, absent adequate legal process, could be unlawful. Wikileaks http://213.251.145.96/cablegate.html Tableau Statement Regarding Wikileaks Documents http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710wikileaks.html Senator Lieberman and Senator Collin's Statement Regarding Wikileaks http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710lieb_collins.html Senator Lieberman's Statement Regarding Wikileaks http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710lieb.html ======================================================================= [2] EPIC Submits Comments on DHS Fusion Center Proposals ======================================================================= EPIC has submitted comments to the National Protection and Programs Directorate and the Office of Operations, two components of the Department of Homeland Security that wish to establish the first federal fusion center. As required by federal laws, the components published a notice of the proposed program in the federal register and allowed thirty days for public comment. The components also published separate notices to announce an intention to exempt the program from key protections in the Federal Privacy Act of 1974, including provisions that require the government to notify an individual about whom information is collected and to give that individual a chance to correct any erroneous data. Fusion centers are digital intelligence databases that compile information on individuals from a variety of different sources, including government agencies, private sector firms, and anonymous tipsters. These programs often have a substantial impact on individual privacy due limited safeguards on the accuracy and retention of the large amounts information that they retain. Congress had suspended funding for a similar program, Total Information Awareness, that sought to aggregate large amounts of information on Americans suspected of no crime. EPIC urged the Department to comply with Privacy Act protections and to improve accountability and oversight of the programs. EPIC noted that "in order to preserve privacy rights, enumerated in the U.S. Constitution and expanded on by statute, the DHS should narrow its claimed exemptions from the Privacy Act of 1974 and provide for specific procedures and requirements to adequately notify, inform, and protect the American public." Among other things, EPIC specifically recommended that the Department "provide individuals with judicially enforceable rights of access and correction" and "limit the mission and goals of the proposed [program] to enumerate standards to guide the collection of information." In the past, the federal government had continually asserted that fusion centers were strictly state and local entities, though federal funding and staff were provided. A 2008 Freedom of Information Act request from EPIC to the Virginia State Police revealed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as a condition to funding, had required the state fusion center to comply with regulations restricting the disclosure of records that would have otherwise been available to the public under state laws. EPIC: Comments to the National Protection and Programs Directorate http://epic.org/privacy/fusion/EPIC_re_DHS-2010-0086_0085.pdf EPIC: Comments to the Office of Operations Coordination and Planning http://epic.org/privacy/fusion/EPIC_re_DHS-2010-0052_0053.pdf DHS: Local and State Fusion Centers http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/gc_1156877184684.shtm Privacy Act of 1974 http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710privacyact.html EPIC: Information Fusion Centers and Privacy http://www.epic.org/privacy/fusion EPIC: Total Information Awareness http://www.epic.org/privacy/profiling/tia EPIC v. Virginia Department of State Police (Fusion Center Secrecy Bill) http://www.epic.org/privacy/virginia_fusion/ ======================================================================= [3] Congress, FTC Privacy Report Examine Possibilities of Do Not Track ======================================================================= The Federal Trade Commission has released a preliminary staff report on privacy and the Internet, following a series of public roundtable discussions. The report recommends the establishment of a Do Not Track mechanism, based in Internet browsers, which would enable users to opt-out of third-party web tracking, including behavioral advertising. The report also calls for simplified consumer privacy notices and recommends that "companies . . . adopt a 'privacy by design' approach by building privacy protections into their everyday business practices." EPIC participated in the roundtable discussions preceding the report, and submitted a statement on the privacy implications of cloud computing and social networking. However, the Commission's report did not address that issue. The Commission also did not consider the need for a U.S. privacy agency, or a comprehensive federal privacy law based on "Fair Information Practices," as EPIC and other privacy groups had urged. Congress considered various proposals for a Do Not Track mechanism in a hearing entitled "Do Not Track Legislation: Is Now the Right Time?" The House Energy and Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection conducted the hearing, which included witnesses from the Department of Commerce, Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Federation of America, TimeWarner, and Symantec. EPIC submitted a statement to the Committee following this hearing, recommending that Congress review the lessons learned from the history of the Do Not Call List and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. EPIC said that an effective Do Not Track initiative must ensure that a consumer's decision to opt-out is "enforceable, persistent, transparent, and simple." FTC Privacy Report http://ftc.gov/os/2010/12/101201privacyreport.pdf FTC Privacy Roundtables http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/privacyroundtables/ EPIC: Statement to FTC on Cloud Computing/Social Networking http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/privacyroundtable/544506-00078.pdf EPIC: Statement on Do Not Track (December 2010) http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710EPICdnt.html House Energy and Commerce Committee: Do Not Track Hearing (December 2010) http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710house_dnt.html National Do Not Call Registry https://www.donotcall.gov/ Telephone Consumer Protection Act http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/policy/TCPA-Rules.pdf EPIC: Online Tracking and Behavioral Advertising http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710EPICtracking.html EPIC: Federal Trade Commission http://epic.org/privacy/internet/ftc/ ======================================================================= [4] Briefing Schedule Announced in EPIC v. DHS, the Body Scanners Case ======================================================================= In EPIC's suit against the Department of Homeland Security to strike down the body scanner program, the Court of Appeals has ordered a new briefing schedule, following multiple motions by the government to delay the case. The court set December 23, 2010 as the government's deadline for filing a response to EPIC's opening brief, which was filed on November 1, 2010. EPIC's final reply brief is due on January 27, 2011. As the case progresses, evidence continues to mount that TSA's full-body scanners are not designed to detect certain explosives or other low-density materials that pose a threat to airline safety. Leon Kaufman and Joseph W. Carlson's new study finds that "Even if exposure were to be increased significantly, normal anatomy would make a dangerous amount of plastic explosives with tapered edges difficult, if not impossible to detect."; Kaufman and Carlson's study examined the imaging and device specifications of the backscatter machines to estimate the body's penetration and exposure from the x-ray beam, as well as the machines' sensitivity to contraband. The study also echoes concerns about the health risks associated with the devices. The previous Congressional spending legislation for hiring and training screeners to implement the body scanners program expires on December 18, 2010. Lawmakers are considering an omnibus appropriations package that will allocate approximately three billion dollars to the agency for the purchase of an additional five thousand screeners. District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals Briefing Schedule Order http://epic.org/Order.pdf EPIC's Opposition to Government's Motion to Extend Filing Deadline http://epic.org/EPIC_Opp_v.%205.pdf Evaluation of Airport X-ray Backscatter Units http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710fbsstudy.html ======================================================================= [5] Google's Street View Practices Face Continued Legal Scrutiny ======================================================================= Connecticut Attorney General and Senator-elect Richard Blumenthal issued a "civil investigative demand," similar to a subpoena, for access to the data collected from homes and businesses in Connecticut by Google's Street View cars. Google has been purposefully and secretively collecting wi-fi data in thirty countries over a three-year period through its Street View vehicles, which Google originally maintained merely collected images. "Google's story changed," Blumenthal said, "first claiming only fragments were collected, then acknowledging entire emails." The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) opened an investigation into Google's actions after EPIC filed a complaint asking the Commission to investigate Google's possible violations of federal wiretap law and the U.S. Communications Act. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently ended its "inquiry" into Street View. Despite requests from Members of Congress, the FTC never pursued an independent investigation of Street View, examined the data collected by Google in the United States, or even acknowledged the findings of other agencies. The Representatives asked the FTC to determine whether Google's actions "form the basis of an unfair or deceptive act or practice that constitutes harm to consumers" and whether Google's actions are "illegal under federal law." EPIC has requested documents from the FTC under the Freedom of Information Act to determine the scope of inquiry and the reason it was ended. Google's wi-fi data collection practices have fun afoul of privacy laws in other countries as well. The New Zealand Privacy Commissioner found that Google had "failed to tell people that it was collecting the open wi-fi information and what it was going to use it for." She added, "Google also breached our privacy law when it collected the content of people's communications." British officials recently announced that Google's Street View wi-fi data collection violated UK data protection laws. The UK Information Commissioner stated, "the collection of this information was not fair or lawful and constitutes a significant breach of the first principle of the Data Protection Act." Google practices have also been found to violate Canadian law, and the Spanish Data Protection Agency has filed suit against Google for five violations of Spanish law. Connecticut Attorney General Announcement http://www.ct.gov/ag/cwp/view.asp?A=2341&Q=463406 Wall Street Journal: FCC Investigation http://www.epic.org/redirect/111910WSJ-FCC.html EPIC: Letter to FCC (May 21, 2010) http://www.epic.org/redirect/111910EPIC-FCC.html FTC: Letter to Google (Oct. 27, 2010) http://www.ftc.gov/os/closings/101027googleletter.pdf Letter from Markey and Barton to FTC (May 19, 2010) http://www.epic.org/redirect/111910markeyLTR.html New Zealand Privacy Commission: Press Release http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710NZpr.html Spanish DPA: Press Release http://www.epic.org/redirect/102210DPApr.html Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada: Press Release http://www.priv.gc.ca/media/nr-c/2010/nr-c_101019_e.cfm EPIC: Google Street View http://epic.org/privacy/streetview/ ======================================================================= [6] News in Brief ======================================================================= Vermont Urges Supreme Court to Overturn Medical Privacy Decision The State of Vermont has petitioned the Supreme Court to review a Court of Appeals decision striking down the state's prescription confidentiality law. The law regulates data mining companies that sell or use doctors' prescribing records containing personal information on patients. EPIC had filed a "friend of the court" brief in support of the law. The decision, issued by the Second Circuit, diverged significantly with two previous decisions upholding similar laws in the First Circuit. Vermont's brief emphasized the importance of consistency across state boundaries, listing twenty-six other states considering proposed prescription confidentiality laws. The Vermont Attorney General wrote, "As the ability to amass volumes of information about prospective customers - including health care providers - grows, States and other regulators need guidance as to the scope of their ability to allow individual Americans to control access to and use of their information." Petition for Certiorari by State of Vermont http://epic.org/Cert%20petition%20Sorrell%20v%20%20IMS%20Health.pdf EPIC "Friend of the Court" Brief in Second Circuit Case http://epic.org/privacy/ims_sorrell/epic_amicus.pdf EPIC: IMS Health v. Sorrell http://epic.org/privacy/ims_sorrell/default.html EPIC: IMS Health v. Ayotte http://epic.org/privacy/imshealth/ European Union Opens Anti-Trust Investigation of Google The European Commission announced it is investigating Google for potential anti-trust violations. The Commission decided to initiate formal proceedings against Google after complaints from search-service providers "about unfavorable treatment of their services in Google's unpaid and sponsored search results coupled with an alleged preferential placement of Google's own services." EPIC previously filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission regarding Google's proposed merger with the advertising company DoubleClick and its implications for consumer privacy. EPIC Executive Director Marc Rotenberg also testified in Congress during the review of this merger, urging the Federal Trade Commission to establish privacy safeguards as a condition of the merger. When the Agency approved the merger without this conditions, EPIC charged that the Agency had "reason to act, and authority to act, but failed to do so." European Commission Announcement http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710EC.html EPIC FTC Complaint (April 2007) http://epic.org/privacy/ftc/google/epic_complaint.pdf EPIC Senate Testimony (September 2007) epic.org/privacy/ftc/google/epic_test_092707.pdf EPIC Letter to FTC (December 2007) http://epic.org/privacy/ftc/google/EPIC_statement122007.pdf EPIC: Google/Double Click Merger http://epic.org/privacy/ftc/google/ ACLU Publishes of Location-Based Services: Time for a Privacy Check-In The ACLU of Northern California released a report examining privacy considerations for mobile location-based services. Location-based services (LBS) include navigation tools, social networking, local searches for businesses and events, and applications linking a user's location to other activities. Smartphones, laptops, and in-car GPS devices, as well as other location-aware devices, can make use of LBS. Companies offering LBS assemble significant profiles of users; the profiles are vulnerable to privacy breaches and are highly sought by law enforcement. In addition to the report, the ACLU of Northern California provides a side-by-side comparison of the most popular LBSs (Foursquare, Facebook Places, Yelp, Gowall, Twitter and Loopt). They urge Congress to update the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) to better protect consumers from the significant risks associated with LBS. ACLU of Northern California http://www.aclunc.org/index.shtml LBS Report: "Location-Based Services: Time for a Privacy Check-In" http://dotrights.org/sites/default/files/lbs-white-paper.pdf Location-Based Services: Side-by-Side Comparison http://dotrights.org/sites/default/files/lbs-comparison.pdf Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) http://www.usiia.org/legis/ecpa.html EPIC: Locational Privacy http://epic.org/privacy/location_privacy/default.html EPIC: Commonwealth v. Connolly http://epic.org/privacy/connolly/default.html Healthcare Technology Panel Releases Report on Medical Privacy The President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology has released a report entitled "Realizing the Full Potential of Health Information Technology to Improve Healthcare for Americans: The Path Forward." The report culls advice from industry and technology experts, privacy groups, healthcare professionals and other experts to offer recommendations for adoption of a "universal exchange language" allowing health care professionals to gain real-time access to patient data while maximizing privacy protections and patient control. Among other recommendations, the report suggests embedding privacy rules, policies and patient preferences in the metadata that will travel with patient records as they are exchanged. The Council further recommends that patient records be protected by regulation and criminal law as technical protections alone would not provide sufficient security against misuse. The report finds that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) insufficiently protects patient privacy and control, in part because most patients do not fully understand their rights under the Act. The President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp/pcast/about President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Report http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710PCAST.html Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 https://www.cms.gov/HIPAAGenInfo/Downloads/HIPAALaw.pdf U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Health Information Privacy http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/index.html EPIC: Medical Record Privacy http://epic.org/privacy/medical/ DOJ Agrees to Minimize Information in National Security Letters The Department of Justice has volunteered to implement civil liberties protections that Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) originally requested as amendments to the USA Patriot Act Reauthorization Bill. According to the Attorney General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation will minimize the collection, use, and storage of information derived from National Security Letters. The minimization measure was approved in committee, but had not yet cleared the full Senate when Sen. Leahy advised the Attorney General that he could voluntarily adopt many of the reforms even without Congressional action. The Attorney General then sent a letter to the Senator to announce that the Bureau has formalized the procedures. After receiving the letter on December 9, 2010, Senator Leahy praised the move. Letter from Attorney General to Senator Patrick Leahy http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710leahy.html S. 1692: U.S. PATRIOT Act Sunset Extension of 2009 http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710s1692.html EPIC: National Security Letters http://epic.org/privacy/nsl/ EPIC FOIA Request Reveals DOJ Security Lapses and Impairment EPIC has published government records it retrieved under a Freedom of Information Act request. The request sought all documents relating to an Intelligence Oversight Board audit of the FBI. The disclosure reveals failures to secure sensitive information stored on the Bureau's classified network and failures comply with Department of Justice oversight. Chief among the incidents discussed in the audit is a reported security breach by a clerical support employee at the Bureau. At the request of two supervisory special agents, the unnamed employee distributed classified documents "to 126 email recipients, both within and outside of the FBI." The audit also contains numerous reports of failures to comply with reporting requirements. The audit report considers those failures to have substantial impaired DOJ oversight of certain FBI investigations. The report states "[w]here, as here, there is no notice whatsoever of the existence of the investigation, there can be no oversight." Intelligence Oversight Board Matter 2007-2099 http://epic.org/FOIA%20Doc%201.pdf Intelligence Oversight Board Mattes 2008-102, 2008-128 to 2008-136 http://epic.org/FOIA%20Doc%202.pdf EPIC: Open Government http://epic.org/open_gov/ ======================================================================= [7] EPIC's Holiday Wish List: Gift Ideas ======================================================================= The Insider, Reece Hirsch http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710TheInsider.html Fast-paced thriller featuring a San Francisco law firm, a crypto company, the NSA, the Russian mafia, and a former EPIC clerk. The Social Network (Two-Disc Collector's Edition) (2010) http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710TheSocialNetwork.html You've seen the movie. Now see it again. And then check your privacy settings. Fair Game, Valerie Plame Wilson http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710FairGame.html Imagine what fun Dick Cheney might have had with Wikileaks. RADTriage 2.0 Personal Radiation Detector http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710RadDetector.html A U.S. Military-grade personal radiation detector that instantly detects radiation exposure in the event of a dirty bomb, nuclear reactor accident and other sources of radiation. This always-on wallet card/badge radiation detector does not require batteries or calibration. The white sensor bar instantly turns blue when it detects harmful levels of radiation. The darker the sensor bar turns, the higher the radiation dose. (Amazon.com) Privacy: The Game http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710PrivacyGame.html A Ballot Box of Fun! This secret ballot game will keep you guessing so vote early and vote often! Players vote by answering a question and placing a Yes or No reply disc in the secret envelope and dropping it into the ballot box. Honesty counts, so answer truthfully. Then predict how many Yes answers are in the box. Guessing the correct number or coming closest to it wins you big points. So get out and rock the vote! (Amazon.com) ScreenGuardZ 4-Way Privacy Screen Protector for iPhone 4 http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710IphoneScreenGuard.html Keep those prying eyes away from your iPhone . . . Privacy Screen Filter for Blackberry Bold 9000 http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710BlackberryScreenGuard.html . . . and your Blackberry. Photo Radar Blocker License Plate Privacy Cover http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710LicenseCover.html Blocks the photo radar camera from seeing your license plate number from cameras along the side of the road. (Amazon.com) Don't Touch My Junk! TSA X-Ray T-Shirt http://www.epic.org/redirect/121710XRayShirt.html Display prominently in airports and other places where TSA agents may be found. ================================ EPIC Publications: "Litigation Under the Federal Open Government Laws 2010," edited by Harry A. Hammitt, Marc Rotenberg, John A. Verdi, Ginger McCall, and Mark S. Zaid (EPIC 2010). Price: $75 http://epic.org/bookstore/foia2010/ Litigation Under the Federal Open Government Laws is the most comprehensive, authoritative discussion of the federal open access laws. This updated version includes new material regarding President Obama's 2009 memo on Open Government, Attorney General Holder's March 2009 memo on FOIA Guidance, and the new executive order on declassification. The standard reference work includes in-depth analysis of litigation under: the Freedom of Information Act, the Privacy Act, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and the Government in the Sunshine Act. The fully updated 2010 volume is the 25th edition of the manual that lawyers, journalists and researchers have relied on for more than 25 years. ================================ "Information Privacy Law: Cases and Materials, Second Edition" Daniel J. Solove, Marc Rotenberg, and Paul Schwartz. (Aspen 2005). Price: $98. http://www.epic.org/redirect/aspen_ipl_casebook.html This clear, comprehensive introduction to the field of information privacy law allows instructors to enliven their teaching of fundamental concepts by addressing both enduring and emerging controversies. The Second Edition addresses numerous rapidly developing areas of privacy law, including: identity theft, government data mining and electronic surveillance law, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, intelligence sharing, RFID tags, GPS, spyware, web bugs, and more. Information Privacy Law, Second Edition, builds a cohesive foundation for an exciting course in this rapidly evolving area of law. ================================ "Privacy & Human Rights 2006: An International Survey of Privacy Laws and Developments" (EPIC 2007). Price: $75. http://www.epic.org/phr06/ This annual report by EPIC and Privacy International provides an overview of key privacy topics and reviews the state of privacy in over 75 countries around the world. The report outlines legal protections, new challenges, and important issues and events relating to privacy. Privacy & Human Rights 2006 is the most comprehensive report on privacy and data protection ever published. ================================ "The Public Voice WSIS Sourcebook: Perspectives on the World Summit on the Information Society" (EPIC 2004). Price: $40. http://www.epic.org/bookstore/pvsourcebook This resource promotes a dialogue on the issues, the outcomes, and the process of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). This reference guide provides the official UN documents, regional and issue-oriented perspectives, and recommendations and proposals for future action, as well as a useful list of resources and contacts for individuals and organizations that wish to become more involved in the WSIS process. ================================ "The Privacy Law Sourcebook 2004: United States Law, International Law, and Recent Developments," Marc Rotenberg, editor (EPIC 2005). Price: $40. http://www.epic.org/bookstore/pls2004/ The Privacy Law Sourcebook, which has been called the "Physician's Desk Reference" of the privacy world, is the leading resource for students, attorneys, researchers, and journalists interested in pursuing privacy law in the United States and around the world. It includes the full texts of major privacy laws and directives such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Privacy Act, and the OECD Privacy Guidelines, as well as an up-to-date section on recent developments. New materials include the APEC Privacy Framework, the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act, and the CAN-SPAM Act. ================================ "Filters and Freedom 2.0: Free Speech Perspectives on Internet Content Controls" (EPIC 2001). Price: $20. http://www.epic.org/bookstore/filters2.0 A collection of essays, studies, and critiques of Internet content filtering. These papers are instrumental in explaining why filtering threatens free expression. ================================ EPIC publications and other books on privacy, open government, free expression, crypto and governance can be ordered at: EPIC Bookstore http://www.epic.org/bookstore ================================ EPIC also publishes EPIC FOIA Notes, which provides brief summaries of interesting documents obtained from government agencies under the Freedom of Information Act. Subscribe to EPIC FOIA Notes at: http://mailman.epic.org/mailman/listinfo/foia_notes ======================================================================= [8] Upcoming Conferences and Events ======================================================================= "Computers, Privacy, and Data Protection Conference European Data Protection: In Good Health?" Brussels, Belgium, 25-28 January 2011. For More Information: http://www.cpdpconferences.org/. "The Tenth Workshop on Economics of Information Security." The George Mason University, 14-15 June 2011. For More Information: http://weis2011.econinfosec.org/index.html. "Computers, Freedom, and Privacy 2011." Georgetown Law Center, Washington D.C., 14-16 June 2011. For More Information: http://www.cfp2010.org/wiki/index.php/Announcement_of_CFP_2011. ======================================================================= Join EPIC on Facebook ======================================================================= Join the Electronic Privacy Information Center on Facebook http://facebook.com/epicprivacy http://epic.org/facebook Start a discussion on privacy. Let us know your thoughts. Stay up to date with EPIC's events. Support EPIC. ======================================================================= Privacy Policy ======================================================================= The EPIC Alert mailing list is used only to mail the EPIC Alert and to send notices about EPIC activities. We do not sell, rent or share our mailing list. We also intend to challenge any subpoena or other legal process seeking access to our mailing list. We do not enhance (link to other databases) our mailing list or require your actual name. In the event you wish to subscribe or unsubscribe your e-mail address from this list, please follow the above instructions under "subscription information." ======================================================================= About EPIC ======================================================================= The Electronic Privacy Information Center is a public interest research center in Washington, DC. It was established in 1994 to focus public attention on emerging privacy issues such as the Clipper Chip, the Digital Telephony proposal, national ID cards, medical record privacy, and the collection and sale of personal information. EPIC publishes the EPIC Alert, pursues Freedom of Information Act litigation, and conducts policy research. For more information, see http://www.epic.org or write EPIC, 1718 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20009. +1 202 483 1140 (tel), +1 202 483 1248 (fax). ======================================================================= Donate to EPIC ======================================================================= If you'd like to support the work of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, contributions are welcome and fully tax-deductible. Checks should be made out to "EPIC" and sent to 1718 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20009. Or you can contribute online at: http://www.epic.org/donate Your contributions will help support Freedom of Information Act and First Amendment litigation, strong and effective advocacy for the right of privacy and efforts to oppose government regulation of encryption and expanding wiretapping powers. Thank you for your support. ======================================================================= Subscription Information ======================================================================= Subscribe/unsubscribe via web interface: http://mailman.epic.org/mailman/listinfo/epic_news Back issues are available at: http://www.epic.org/alert The EPIC Alert displays best in a fixed-width font, such as Courier. ------------------------- END EPIC Alert 17.25 ------------------------
Share this page:
Subscribe to the EPIC Alert
The EPIC Alert is a biweekly newsletter highlighting emerging privacy issues.