<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>epic.org</title>
      <link>http://epic.org/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:19:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC Asks FTC to Investigate Snapchat</title>
         <description><![CDATA[EPIC filed a <a href="/privacy/ftc/EPIC-Snapchat-Complaint.pdf">complaint</a> with the Federal Trade Commission against Snapchat, the publisher of a mobile app that encourages user to share intimate photos and videos. The company represents that users can make photos and videos "disappear forever." In fact, the photos can be retrieved by others after they should have vanished. The EPIC complaint implicates Privacy Enhancing Technologies, which if properly implemented would minimize or eliminate the collection of personally identifiable information. The FTC described similar methods in a <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2012/03/120326privacyreport.pdf">2012 privacy report</a>. Previously, EPIC filed a <a href="/privacy/ask/">complaint</a> at the FTC against AskEraser, which falsely represented that search queries would be deleted when in fact they were retained by the company and made available to law enforcement agencies. For more information, see <a href="/privacy/internet/ftc/">EPIC: Federal Trade Commission</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/epic-asks-ftc-to-investigate-s.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/epic-asks-ftc-to-investigate-s.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Federal Trade Commission</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FTC</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">privacy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Snapchat</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Social Networking</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:19:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Congress Seeks Answers on Google Glass Privacy Risks</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Members of the bipartisan Privacy Caucus sent a <a href="http://joebarton.house.gov/images/GoogleGlassLtr_051613.pdf">letter</a> to Google seeking answers to questions about Glass, a wearable computer that routinely records video and audio, and gathers locational data. Among several questions, the Members of Congress asked "how Google plans to prevent Google Glass from unintentionally collecting data about the user/non-user without consent?" and whether Glass would be able to use facial recognition technology. Recently, Attorneys general for 38 states and the District of Columbia <a href="http://www.ct.gov/ag/lib/ag/press_releases/2013/20130312_google_avc.pdf">reached a $7 million settlement</a> with Google over the unauthorized collection of data from wireless networks, including private WiFi networks of residential Internet users. Early last year, Google collapsed its privacy policies, prompting objections from <a href="/privacy/ftc/google/consent-order.html">EPIC</a> <a href="/privacy/google/20120222-Google-Privacy-Policy-Final.pdf">state attorneys general</a>, <a href="/privacy/ftc/google/Congress-Ltr-FTC-Google-2-17-12.pdf">members of Congress</a>, and <a href="http://safegov.org/2012/1/25/google%E2%80%99s-new-privacy-policy-is-unacceptable-and-jeopardizes-government-information-in-the-cloud" target="_new">IT managers in the government and private sectors</a>. For more information, see <a href="/privacy/google/glass/default.html">EPIC: Google Glass and Wearable Computers</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/congress-seeks-answers-on-goog.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/congress-seeks-answers-on-goog.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Google Glass</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">privacy</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:55:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>White House Supports Media Shield Law</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Following the controversy concerning the Justice Department&#8217;s <a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/news/2013/05142013.html" target="_new">subpoena</a> of Associated Press calling records, the Obama administration announced support for a media shield law. The White House has <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/15/press-briefing-press-secretary-jay-carney-5152013" target="_new">asked</a> Senator Charles E. Schumer to reintroduce the <a href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111s448rs/pdf/BILLS-111s448rs.pdf">Free Flow of Information Act</a>, a bill that would limit government access to information about confidential sources and would allow journalists to move to quash subpoenas of their phone records. EPIC is currently seeking the legal basis for the Justice Department&#8217;s subpoena of  phone records through a <a href="/foia/doj/epic-olc-reporter-surveillance-foia-request.pdf">Freedom of Information Act request</a>. For more information, see <a href="/free_speech/free_flow_of_information_act.html">EPIC: Free Flow of Information Act</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/white-house-supports-media-shi.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/white-house-supports-media-shi.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Free Flow of Information Act</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">privacy</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:09:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Colorado State Board of Education Study Session Regarding inBloom, Inc.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><a href="http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeboard/Meeting_Agendas_and_Audio.htm" target="_new">Colorado State Board of Education Study Session Regarding inBloom, Inc.</a></p>

<p align="left">Khaliah Barnes,<br />
EPIC Administrative Law Counsel</p>

<p align="left"><a href="http://www.cde.state.co.us/index_sbe.htm" target="_new">Colorado State Board of Education</a><br />
May 16, 2013</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/colorado-state-board-of-educat.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/colorado-state-board-of-educat.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">EPIC Events</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:16:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Amendment to Immigration Bill Seeks to Limit Drone Surveillance on Border</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The Senate Judiciary Committee has <a href="http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/legislation/immigration/" target="_new">approved</a> an <a href="http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/legislation/immigration/amendments/Feinstein/Feinstein11-(ARM13559).pdf">Amendment</a> to the <a href="http://www.schumer.senate.gov/forms/immigration.pdf">immigration bill</a> to limit the range of drones surveillance in the United States. The immigration bill grants the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection authority to operate surveillance drones continuously within the border region. <a href="http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/home" target="_new">Senator Dianne Feinstein's (D-CA)</a> Amendment reduces the patrol area of surveillance drones from 100 miles around the border to 25 miles. More than two-thirds of the US population lives within 100 miles of the border. In February 2013, EPIC <a href="/drones_petition/">petitioned</a> the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection to suspend the border drone surveillance program pending the establishment of concrete privacy regulations. The petition followed the production of documents to EPIC under the Freedom of Information Act demonstrating that the border drones had the ability to <a href="/privacy/drones/EPIC-2010-Performance-Specs-1.pdf">intercept electronic communications</a> and <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/287.1">identify human targets</a>. For more information, see <a href="/privacy/drones/">EPIC: Domestic Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Drones</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/amendment-to-immigration-bill-.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/amendment-to-immigration-bill-.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Drone</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">drones</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">privacy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">UAV</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:48:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><a href="http://www.pwc100.org/newsletter.htm#CurrentProgram" target="_new">The Use of Robotic Aircraft in Law Enforcement</a></p>

<p align="left">Amie Stepanovich,<br />
Director, EPIC Government Surveillance Program</p>

<p align="left"><a href="http://www.pwc100.org/" target="_new">Prince William Committee of 100<br />
Lake Ridge, VA<br />
May 15, 2013</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/the-use-of-robotic-aircraft.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/the-use-of-robotic-aircraft.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">EPIC Events</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:03:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>ASAP 6th Annual National Training Conference</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><a href="http://www.accesspro.org/programs/trainingconf/2013/index.cfm" target="_new">ASAP 6th Annual National Training Conference</a></p>

<p align="left">Ginger McCall,<br />
Director, EPIC Open Government Program</p>

<p align="left">ASAP<br />
Arlington, VA<br />
May 15, 2013</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/asap-6th-annual-national-train.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/asap-6th-annual-national-train.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">EPIC Events</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:24:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC Asks House Committee to Press DOJ on News Media Subpoenas</title>
         <description><![CDATA[For the House Judiciary Committee hearing on <a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/113th/hear_05152013.html" target="_new">Oversight of the United States Department of Justice</a>, EPIC has sent a <a href="/privacy/surveillance/EPIC-Ltr-DOJ-AP.pdf">letter</a> to Committee Members regarding the <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/govt-obtains-wide-ap-phone-records-probe" target="_new">surveillance of Associated Press reporters</a>. EPIC asked the Committee to determine whether the Justice Department complied with regulations on news media subpoenas, which were enacted in 1980 after passage of the <a href="/privacy/ppa/">Privacy Protection Act</a>. For more information, see <a href="/privacy/ppa/">EPIC: Privacy Protection Act of 1980</a> and <a href="/privacy/nsa/foia/">EPIC: Warrantless Surveillance Program</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/epic-asks-house-committee-to-p.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/epic-asks-house-committee-to-p.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">privacy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Privacy Protection Act</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Warrantless Surveillance Program</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 10:46:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC Seeks Documents on Government&apos;s Authority to Search Journalists&apos; Email</title>
         <description><![CDATA[EPIC has filed a <a href="/foia/doj/epic-olc-reporter-surveillance-foia-request.pdf">Freedom of Information Act request</a> with the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel, seeking documents explaining the DOJ's legal authority to search the electronic communications of reporters. Following news reports that the <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/govt-probe-obtains-wide-swath-ap-phone-records" target="_new">DOJ seized the telephone records of the Associated Press</a>, EPIC's request seeks to discover the legal basis for the action as well as whether the DOJ could obtain the email or text messaging records of journalists. In 2005, EPIC filed the first FOIA request concerning the government's <a href="/privacy/nsa/foia/">"warrantless wiretapping"</a>. EPIC eventually obtained <a href="/privacy/nsa/oip_excerpt.pdf">emails and a memo (pdf)</a> from a former high-level Justice Department official expressing doubt about the government's argument in favor of the legality of the program. EPIC also obtained <a href="/privacy/nsa/messages.pdf">internal messages (pdf)</a> from the NSA's director to agency staff, defending the NSA's warrantless eavesdropping and discouraging employees from discussing the issue with the news media. For more information, see <a href="/open_gov/">EPIC: Open Government</a>, <a href="/amicus/foia/new-york-times/">EPIC: New York Times v. DOJ</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/epic-seeks-documents-on-govern.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/epic-seeks-documents-on-govern.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">New York TImes v. DOJ</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NSA</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">open government</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">privacy</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 16:16:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC to Honor Senators Paul and Wyden, AP Reporter Mendoza, Consumer Advocate Grant, and Privacy Scholar Flaherty</title>
         <description><![CDATA[EPIC has announced the recipients of the 2013 EPIC Champion of Freedom Awards. They are Senator Rand Paul, Senator Ron Wyden, and AP Reporter Martha Mendoza. Susan Grant will receive the EPIC Privacy Advocate award and David Flaherty will receive the EPIC Lifetime Achievement Award. The awards are given annually to courageous individuals who have defended privacy, open government, and democratic values. Previous recipients include federal judges, members of Congress, journalists, litigators, advocates, and philanthropists. The first EPIC Champion of Freedom Award was given to Senator Patrick Leahy in 2004. The 2013 award recipients will be honored at the <a href="/june3/">EPIC Champion of Freedom Awards dinner</a> in Washington, DC, Monday June 3, 2013. <a href="http://epic.givezooks.com/events/epic-s-champion-of-freedom-awards-dinner-2013">Tickets available</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/epic-to-honor-senators-paul-an.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/epic-to-honor-senators-paul-an.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 14:55:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>On Proposed Trade Agreement, EPIC Says Keep Privacy Off the Table</title>
         <description><![CDATA[EPIC has submitted <a href="/privacy/ttip/EPICTTIPCommentsFINAL.pdf">comments</a> to the U.S. Trade Representative addressing the <a href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-04-01/pdf/2013-07430.pdf">Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership</a>, a proposed trade agreement between the US and the European Union. In its comments, EPIC recommended that the TTIP negotiations exclude consumer privacy and data policy. Mindful of the US' progress in recent years on developing the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/privacy-final.pdf">Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights</a> and the EU's <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/document/review2012/com_2012_11_en.pdf">General Data Protection Regulation</a>, EPIC cautioned the USTR that an attempt to harmonize existing privacy regulations would not end well. If provisions about cross-border data flows arises, EPIC urged the USTR to ensure that consumers are given the highest level of privacy protections.  EPIC also recommended that all drafts of negotiating texts be made publicly available since <a href="http://www.citizen.org/documents/Leaked-TPP-Investment-Analysis.pdf">previous negotiating documents</a> in similar trade agreement negotiations have been kept secret. EPIC has recently begun a new FOIA project to obtain information about the statements of US officials  who participate in international negotiations concerning privacy and data protection. For more information, see <a href="/TTIP.html">EPIC: TTIP</a>. and <a href="/open_gov/">EPIC: Open Government</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/on-proposed-trade-agreement-ep.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/on-proposed-trade-agreement-ep.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">open government</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">privacy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">TTIP</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 17:58:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>White House Launches Open Data Project</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The President issued an <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/09/executive-order-making-open-and-machine-readable-new-default-government-" target="_new">Executive Order</a> and <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2013/m-13-13.pdf">memorandum</a> this week outlining the administration's new "Open Data Policy." According to the White House, the goal is to make information "accessible, discoverable, and usable by the public" and to "promote interoperability and openness." The Executive Order states that agencies should also "safeguard individual privacy, confidentiality, and national security." The White House has launched <a href="http://project-open-data.github.io/" target="_new">Project Open Data</a>, a collection of code, tools, and case studies to help agencies adopt the open data policy. An article in Foreign Policy this week <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/05/09/think_again_big_data" target="_new">"Think Again: Big Data"</a> raises provocative questions about the actual value of "Big Data." For more information on Open Government issues, see: <a href="/open_gov/">EPIC: Open Government</a> and <a href="http://epic.org/privacy/1974act/">EPIC: Privacy Act</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/white-house-launches-open-data.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/white-house-launches-open-data.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">open government</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">privacy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Privacy Act of 1974</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 17:50:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Court Permits Police Use of Phony Cell Phone Tower</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A federal court in Arizona has <a href="/foia/fbi/stingray/Rigmaiden-Suppression-Order.pdf">denied</a> a motion to suppress evidence gathered by "StingRay" surveillance technology. The court in United States v. Rigmaiden held that investigators did not violate the Fourth Amendment. The court also held that the government's use of a cell site simulator or StingRay device was supported by a "mobile tracking device" warrant. EPIC recently <a href="/2013/01/epic-to-argue-for-location-pri.html">argued</a> that users have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the location of their mobile devices, and has also received <a href="/foia/fbi/stingray/">hundreds of pages</a> of documents related to the FBI's use of StingRay technology. For more information, see <a href="/foia/fbi/stingray/">EPIC v. FBI: StingRay</a> and <a href="/amicus/location/earls/">EPIC: State v. Earls</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/court-permits-police-use-of-ph.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/court-permits-police-use-of-ph.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">privacy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">State v. Earls</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">stingray</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 15:21:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Coalition of Organizations Call for Greater Accountability for E-Verify</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Numerous organizations across the political spectrum have <a href="http://www.aclu.org/immigrants-rights/coalition-letter-supporting-franken-e-verify-amendment">urged</a> Congress to reduce the error rate for the employment verification system "E-Verify". A bill now pending in Congress will mandate employer verification of an all employees&#8217; eligibility to work in the United States. In <a href="/privacy/ssn/eevs_test_060707.pdf">testimony</a> before Congress in 2007, EPIC warned of inaccurate employment determinations in the E-Verify system. EPIC also cautioned against straining the resources of the Social Security Administration and the aggregation of employment data into a central location. In June 2011, EPIC filed <a href="/privacy/EPIC%20E-Verify%20Comments%20Final%2006.08.11.pdf">comments</a> with the Department of Homeland Security in opposition of the proposed expansion of E-Verify. For more information, see <a href="/privacy/e-verify/">EPIC: E-Verify and Privacy</a> and <a href="/privacy/surveillance/spotlight/0707/">EPIC: Spotlight on Surveillance - E-verify System</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/coalition-of-organizations-cal.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/coalition-of-organizations-cal.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">e-verify</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">privacy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">surveillance</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 13:09:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><a href="http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/america-surveillance-state/5186d6402b8c2a152e0004f2" target="_new">"Our Startlingly Limitless Surveillance State"</a></p>

<p align="left">Marc Rotenberg,<br />
EPIC Executive Director</p>

<p align="left">HuffPost Live<br />
May 8, 2013</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2013/05/our-startlingly-limitless-surv.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2013/05/our-startlingly-limitless-surv.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">EPIC Events</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:47:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
