Unanimous Supreme Court Upholds Privacy Rights of Cell Phone Users

The Supreme Court ruled today that a warrantless search of a cell phone violates the Fourth Amendment, even when it occurs during a lawful arrest. The Court's decision in Riley v. California makes clear that "a search of the information on a cell phone bears little resemblance to the type of brief physical search" allowed in the past. The Court said "Cell phones differ in both a quantitative and a qualitative sense from other objects that might be kept on an arrestee's person." EPIC, joined by 24 legal scholars and technical experts on the EPIC Advisory Board, filed a friend of the court brief, arguing that cell phones contain a wealth of sensitive personal data, and that officers can reasonably secure phones while they apply for a warrant to search them. EPIC wrote, "Allowing police officers to search a person's cell phone without a warrant following an arrest would be a substantial infringement on privacy, is unnecessary, and unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment." The EPIC brief was cited by the Supreme Court in its decision. For more information, see EPIC: Riley v. California.


« Defense Agency Adopts Favorable Open Government Rules After EPIC Comments | Main | US-German Cyber Dialogue;Ensuring Security and Freedom »

Share this page:

Support EPIC

EPIC relies on support from individual donors to pursue our work.

Defend Privacy. Support EPIC.

EPIC Champion of Freedom Awards Dinner 2016

Dinner image

National Press Club
Washington, DC
June 6, 2016

#Privacy