Our Work

Digital Library

Sort By

Borden v. eFinancial, LLC

Whether the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s autodialer definition is limited to equipment that use a random or sequential number generator to generate telephone numbers.
- Consumer Privacy
- Robocalls
- Amicus Briefs
Tuggle v. United States

Whether the Fourth Amendment protects against warrantless long-term, continuous, and covert pole camera surveillance of the outside of a person’s home.
- Fourth Amendment
- Privacy Laws
- Surveillance Oversight
- Amicus Briefs
Sharpe v. Winterville Police Department

Whether a passenger in a car has a First Amendment right to livestream a traffic stop.
- Democracy & Free Speech
- Amicus Briefs
McCurley v. Royal Seas Cruises

Whether Royal Seas Cruises can be held vicariously liable for illegal robocalls made on its behalf using bad leads from an online lead generator.
- Consumer Privacy
- Robocalls
- Amicus Briefs
Sanchez v. Los Angeles Department of Transportation

Whether compelled disclosure of detailed location information on individual e-scooter trips violates the Fourth Amendment.
- Data Protection
- Fourth Amendment
- Location Tracking
- Privacy Laws
- Amicus Briefs
United States v. Morton

Whether law enforcement can perform an invasive forensic search of the entire contents of a phone when it only has probable cause to search some of the data on the phone.
- Fourth Amendment
- Privacy Laws
- Amicus Briefs
Cothron v. White Castle

Whether a person can sue only for the first time their data is collected or disclosed without consent in violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act ("BIPA").
- Enforcement of Privacy Laws
- Face Surveillance & Biometrics
- Surveillance Oversight
- Amicus Briefs
TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez

Whether plaintiffs in FCRA and other privacy suits can establish standing based on a violation of their statutory rights.
- Article III Standing
- Consumer Privacy
- Amicus Briefs
Wisconsin v. Burch

Whether a reasonable person who verbally consents to a limited search of their cell phone authorizes law enforcement to download that phone’s entire contents, store a copy of the data indefinitely, and use it in unrelated investigations based on a vague consent form.
- Fourth Amendment
- Privacy Laws
- Amicus Briefs
Lindenbaum v. Realgy, LLC

Whether the Supreme Court's decision to invalidate and sever the government debt exception from the Telephone Consumer Protection Act's robocall ban requires courts grant retroactive immunity to robocallers for illegal calls made for the five years between the exception's enactment and the Court's decision to sever.
- Consumer Privacy
- Enforcement of Privacy Laws
- Robocalls
- Amicus Briefs

Support Our Work

EPIC's work is funded by the support of individuals like you, who allow us to continue to protect privacy, open government, and democratic values in the information age.

Donate