Our Work

Digital Library

Sort By

In re: Casino-Style Games Litigation

Whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which prohibits treating internet companies as the speakers of third-party information, prevents lawsuits against internet companies who sell illegal products provided by third parties on their online marketplaces.
- Consumer Privacy
- Amicus Briefs
Bride et al. v. Snap et al.

Whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act prohibits (1) misrepresentation claims against internet companies who, after claiming in their terms of service that they would ban and reveal the identities of users who cyberbullied others, then refused to do so, and (2) products liability claims against the same defendants for designing an allegedly unsafe messaging product that allowed users to send anonymous, abusive messages to teens.
- Data Protection
- Democracy & Free Speech
- Privacy Laws
- U.S. Privacy Laws
- Amicus Briefs
Public Interest Legal Foundation v. Bellows

Whether the National Voting Rights Act prohibiting state laws that limit how people can access and use voters' personal information.
- Democracy & Free Speech
- Privacy Laws
- U.S. State Privacy Laws
- Voter Privacy
- Amicus Briefs
NetChoice v. Bonta
- Children's Privacy
- Consumer Privacy
- Data Protection
- Open Government
- Privacy Impact Assessments
- Privacy Laws
- U.S. State Privacy Laws
- Amicus Briefs
O.W. v. Carr et al.
- Data Protection
- Fourth Amendment
- Privacy Laws
- Student Privacy
- Amicus Briefs
Sequeira v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.

Whether money transfer companies such as Western Union are financial institutions under the Right to Financial Privacy Act, which requires the federal government to obtain a valid subpoena or warrant to access individuals' financial records and to provide the individuals with notice and an opportunity to challenge the access?
- Privacy Laws
- Surveillance Oversight
- U.S. Privacy Laws
- Amicus Briefs
Seymour v. Colorado

Whether reverse keyword search warrants violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Colorado state constitution.
- Access to Information
- Democracy & Free Speech
- Fourth Amendment
- Privacy Laws
- Amicus Briefs
Facebook v. New Jersey

When police want to order a social media company to give them access to a person's future social media messages every 15 minutes for a period of thirty days, can they do so through one search warrant, or do they need to apply for a wiretap order?
- Communications Privacy
- Consumer Privacy
- Privacy Laws
- Surveillance Oversight
- U.S. Privacy Laws
- U.S. State Privacy Laws
- Wiretapping
- Amicus Briefs
Limon v. Circle K Stores Inc.

Whether state courts should use the more restrictive federal court standing analysis when deciding whether plaintiffs have standing to sue.
- Article III Standing
- Consumer Privacy
- Workplace Privacy
- Amicus Briefs
Peter Maldini v. Marriott International, Inc.
- Article III Standing
- Consumer Privacy
- Cybersecurity
- Data Security
- Amicus Briefs

Support Our Work

EPIC's work is funded by the support of individuals like you, who allow us to continue to protect privacy, open government, and democratic values in the information age.

Donate