EPIC - Electronic Privacy Information Center
    • AI & Human Rights
      • Commercial AI Use
      • Gov't AI Use
      • AI in the Criminal Justice System
      • AI Policy
      • Screening & Scoring
    • Consumer Privacy
      • Big Data
      • Social Media Privacy
      • Data Brokers
      • Communications Privacy
      • Robocalls
      • Competition and Privacy
      • Web Scraping
      • Article III Standing
    • Cybersecurity
      • Data Security
      • Encryption
      • Election Security
      • Presidential Directives
    • Data Protection
      • International Privacy
      • Enforcement of Privacy Laws
      • Government Records & Privacy
      • Location Tracking
      • Children's Privacy
      • Student Privacy
      • Health Privacy
      • Workplace Privacy
    • Democracy & Free Speech
      • Privacy & Racial Justice
      • Voter Privacy
      • Census Privacy
      • Donor Privacy
      • Anonymity
      • Online Harassment
      • Access to Information
    • Open Government
      • Freedom of Information Act
      • Federal Advisory Committee Act
      • Privacy Impact Assessments
    • Privacy Laws
      • Fourth Amendment
      • International Privacy Laws
      • U.S. Privacy Laws
      • State Privacy Laws
    • Surveillance Oversight
      • Face Surveillance & Biometrics
      • Drones & Aerial Surveillance
      • Traveler Screening & Border Surveillance
      • Privacy in Public
      • Intelligence Surveillance
      • Government Databases
      • PATRIOT Act
      • Wiretapping
    • Updates
    • Analysis
    • EPIC Alert
    • Events
    • EPIC Publications
    • Digital Library
    • EPIC in the News
    • Press Kit
    • EPIC Statements
    • EPIC Commentaries
    • About Us
    • EPIC Projects
    • Board & Staff
    • EPIC Advisory Board
    • Careers & Internships
    • Being a Non-profit
    • Cy Pres Awards
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
  • DONATE

Our Work

Digital Library

Filters

Sort By

  • Kenneth Johansen v. Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc.

    Whether a consumer is inadequate to serve as a TCPA class representative when, in order to identify the company bankrolling an illegal telemarketing campaign, the consumer feigns interest in the telemarketer’s offer.

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Robocalls

    • Amicus Briefs

  • Evans v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

    Whether the Telephone Consumer Protection Act's autodialer restriction only covers dialers that generate random or sequential telephone numbers.

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Robocalls

    • Amicus Briefs

  • Panzarella v. Navient Solutions

    Whether the Telephone Consumer Protection Act's autodialer restriction only covers dialers that generate random or sequential telephone numbers.

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Robocalls

    • Amicus Briefs

  • Borden v. eFinancial, LLC

    Whether the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s autodialer definition is limited to equipment that use a random or sequential number generator to generate telephone numbers.

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Robocalls

    • Amicus Briefs

  • McCurley v. Royal Seas Cruises

    Whether Royal Seas Cruises can be held vicariously liable for illegal robocalls made on its behalf using bad leads from an online lead generator.

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Robocalls

    • Amicus Briefs

  • Lindenbaum v. Realgy, LLC

    Whether the Supreme Court's decision to invalidate and sever the government debt exception from the Telephone Consumer Protection Act's robocall ban requires courts grant retroactive immunity to robocallers for illegal calls made for the five years between the exception's enactment and the Court's decision to sever.

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Enforcement of Privacy Laws

    • Robocalls

    • Amicus Briefs

  • Facebook v. Duguid

    Whether the Telephone Consumer Protection Act prohibits use of mass telephone dialing systems that dial numbers from a database.

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Robocalls

    • Amicus Briefs

  • Gadelhak v. AT&T Services, Inc.

    Whether a telephone dialing or text messaging system that mass dials telephone numbers from a list is an autodialer under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Robocalls

    • Amicus Briefs

  • PDR Networks v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic

    Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the FCC's legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Enforcement of Privacy Laws

    • Robocalls

    • Amicus Briefs

  • Gallion v. Charter Communications

    Whether the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ban on unsolicited calls to mobile phones using an autodialer or prerecorded voice message is constitutional under the First Amendment

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Robocalls

    • Amicus Briefs

Support Our Work

EPIC's work is funded by the support of individuals like you, who allow us to continue to protect privacy, open government, and democratic values in the information age.

Donate
Epic.org | Electronic Privacy Information Center
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

1519 New Hampshire Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20036

Phone number: 202.483.1140

| info@epic.org

Sign Up for EPIC Alerts

EPIC uses MailChimp to maintain our mailing list and send newsletters. View MailChimp's privacy policy.
  • Issues
    • AI & Human Rights
    • Consumer Privacy
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Democracy & Free Speech
    • Open Government
    • Privacy Laws
    • Surveillance Oversight
  • Our Work
    • Updates
    • Analysis
    • EPIC Alert
    • Events
    • EPIC Publications
    • Digital Library
  • Media
    • EPIC in the News
    • Press Kit
    • EPIC Statements
    • EPIC Commentaries
  • About
    • EPIC Projects
    • Board & Staff
    • EPIC Advisory Board
    • Careers & Internships
    • Being a Non-profit
    • Cy Pres Awards
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
DONATE Copyright

© 1994 - 2022 EPIC, all rights reserved.