Our Work
Digital Library
Sort By
-
Ninth Circuit Recognizes Section 230 Not a Get-Out-of-Jail-Free Card for Tech Companies That Allegedly Lie to Users
August 22, 2024
-
Platform Accountability & Governance
-
Section 230
-
Updates
-
-
Ninth Circuit Strikes Down Portion of California AADC but Leaves the Rest Intact for Now
August 16, 2024
-
Platform Accountability & Governance
-
Platform Governance Laws & Regulations
-
Privacy Laws
-
The First Amendment
-
U.S. State Privacy Laws
-
Updates
-
-
Utah Federal District Court Beats Back NetChoice’s Typically Overbroad Section 230 Arguments
July 25, 2024
-
Platform Accountability & Governance
-
Platform Governance Laws & Regulations
-
Updates
-
-
Ninth Circuit Signals Mixed Bag for Litigants in NetChoice v. Bonta and X v. Bonta
July 18, 2024
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Platform Accountability & Governance
-
Platform Governance Laws & Regulations
-
The First Amendment
-
Updates
-
-
SCOTUS Will Hear Texas Age-Gating Case
July 2, 2024
This morning, the Supreme Court granted cert in a case challenging the constitutionality of a Texas law that requires users to verify their ages before accessing websites where more than one-third of the available material is sexually explicit.
-
Age Assurance
-
Children's Privacy
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Protection
-
Platform Accountability & Governance
-
Platform Governance Laws & Regulations
-
Privacy Laws
-
Proposed U.S. Legislation
-
Social Media Privacy
-
The First Amendment
-
U.S. State Privacy Laws
-
Updates
-
-
Supreme Court Deals Blow to Big Tech’s Campaign to Immunize Itself from Regulation
July 1, 2024
The Supreme Court’s decision in the NetChoice cases is a huge loss for NetChoice. NetChoice's shoot-for-the-moon strategy failed miserably. The Big Tech trade group sought a pronouncement that platform design choices are wholly protected expression, but the Court refused to take the bait. Instead, the Court took the approach that EPIC advocated in its amicus brief: to the extent that the decision recognizes any protected editorial judgment for platforms’ decisions about whether and how to display content, it is narrowly confined to decisions that reflect a company’s judgements about the content, and does not include content-neutral design decisions.
-
Children's Privacy
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Protection
-
Platform Accountability & Governance
-
Platform Governance Laws & Regulations
-
Privacy Laws
-
Proposed U.S. Legislation
-
Social Media Privacy
-
The First Amendment
-
U.S. Privacy Laws
-
U.S. State Privacy Laws
-
Updates
-
-
SCOTUS Finds No Standing for Plaintiffs in Murthy v. Missouri First Amendment Jawboning Case
June 26, 2024
-
Platform Accountability & Governance
-
The First Amendment
-
Updates
-
-
Ninth Circuit Agrees with EPIC: Judges Must Apply a Narrow, Duties-Based Section 230 Analysis to Each Claim in a Lawsuit
May 21, 2024
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Platform Accountability & Governance
-
Updates
-
-
In Doe v. Grindr, EPIC Urges Ninth Circuit to Continue Using Its Narrow, Nuanced Section 230 Approach
May 20, 2024
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Platform Accountability & Governance
-
Updates
-
-
EPIC Tells Ninth Circuit That X Has To Do More Than Assert Hypothetical Harm To Strike Down California Disclosure Law
March 28, 2024
-
Access to Information
-
Democracy & Free Speech
-
Platform Accountability & Governance
-
Platform Governance Laws & Regulations
-
The First Amendment
-
Updates
-
Support Our Work
EPIC's work is funded by the support of individuals like you, who allow us to continue to protect privacy, open government, and democratic values in the information age.
Donate