EPIC - Electronic Privacy Information Center
    • AI & Human Rights
      • Commercial AI Use
      • Gov't AI Use
      • AI in the Criminal Justice System
      • AI Policy
      • Screening & Scoring
    • Consumer Privacy
      • FTC Commercial Surveillance Rulemaking
      • Big Data
      • Social Media Privacy
      • Data Brokers
      • Communications Privacy
      • Robocalls
      • Competition and Privacy
      • Web Scraping
      • Article III Standing
    • Cybersecurity
      • Data Security
      • Encryption
      • Election Security
      • Presidential Directives
    • Data Protection
      • International Privacy
      • Enforcement of Privacy Laws
      • Government Records & Privacy
      • Location Tracking
      • Children's Privacy
      • Student Privacy
      • Health Privacy
      • Workplace Privacy
    • Democracy & Free Speech
      • Privacy & Racial Justice
      • Voter Privacy
      • Census Privacy
      • Donor Privacy
      • Anonymity
      • Online Harassment
      • Access to Information
    • Open Government
      • Freedom of Information Act
      • Federal Advisory Committee Act
      • Privacy Impact Assessments
    • Privacy Laws
      • Fourth Amendment
      • International Privacy Laws
      • U.S. Privacy Laws
      • Proposed U.S. Legislation
      • State Privacy Laws
    • Surveillance Oversight
      • FISA Section 702
      • Face Surveillance & Biometrics
      • Drones & Aerial Surveillance
      • Traveler Screening & Border Surveillance
      • Privacy in Public
      • Intelligence Surveillance
      • Government Databases
      • PATRIOT Act
      • Wiretapping
    • Updates
    • Analysis
    • EPIC Alert
    • Events
    • EPIC Publications
    • Digital Library
    • EPIC in the News
    • Press Kit
    • EPIC Statements
    • EPIC Commentaries
    • About Us
    • EPIC Projects
    • Board & Staff
    • EPIC Advisory Board
    • Careers & Internships
    • Being a Non-profit
    • Cy Pres Awards
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
  • DONATE

Our Work

Digital Library

Filters

Sort By

  • New EPIC Report Sheds Light on Generative A.I. Harms 

    EPIC has just released a new report detailing the wide variety of harms that new generative A.I. tools like ChatGPT, Midjourney, and DALL-E pose! While many of these tools have been lauded for their capability to produce new and believable text, images, audio, and videos, the rapid integration of generative AI technology into consumer-facing products has undermined years-long efforts to make AI development transparent and accountable.

    • AI Policy

    • Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights

    • Big Data

    • Commercial AI Use

    • Competition and Privacy

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Democracy & Free Speech

    • Online Harassment

    • Privacy & Racial Justice

    • Updates

  • Generating Harms: Generative AI’s Impact & Paths Forward

    EPIC's report on generative A.I. harms and the policy interventions that can mitigate them.

    • AI Policy

    • Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights

    • Commercial AI Use

    • Publications

  • Supreme Court Avoids Major Section 230 Ruling in Case About Digital Platforms Recommending Terrorist Content

    The Supreme Court has declined to address whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a law that encourages tech companies to moderate content on their platforms, immunizes companies like Google and Twitter from lawsuits alleging that their recommendation algorithms promoted terrorist activity. In a pair of decisions released today—Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh.

    • Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights

    • Commercial AI Use

    • Democracy & Free Speech

    • Online Harassment

    • Updates

  • EPIC Joins Consumer Groups in Urging Supreme Court to Reject Attack on the CFPB

    • Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights

    • Commercial AI Use

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Data Brokers

    • Data Protection

    • Enforcement of Privacy Laws

    • Screening & Scoring

    • Updates

  • EU Parliament Approves AI Act, Urges Rejection of Transatlantic Data Framework

    uropean Parliament held a series of meetings, resulting in adopting both the text of the AI Act and a resolution outlining risks and proposals for change in the currently-proposed EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework.

    • AI in the Criminal Justice System

    • AI Policy

    • Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights

    • Commercial AI Use

    • Consumer Privacy

    • Data Protection

    • Enforcement of Privacy Laws

    • International Privacy

    • International Privacy Laws

    • Privacy Laws

    • Screening & Scoring

    • Web Scraping

    • Updates

  • Key U.S. Enforcement Agencies Commit to Enforcement of Existing Laws on Entities Using AI

    • AI in the Criminal Justice System

    • AI Policy

    • Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights

    • Commercial AI Use

    • Government AI Use

    • Screening & Scoring

    • Updates

  • EPIC and ACLU Urge NIST to Advance Privacy in Digital Identity Guidelines

    • Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights

    • Government AI Use

    • Government Databases

    • Surveillance Oversight

    • Updates

  • EPIC Recommends ACUS Consider Administrative Burdens Exacerbated By Scoring and Screening Tools, Recommend Transparency

    • AI in the Criminal Justice System

    • AI Policy

    • Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights

    • Government AI Use

    • Screening & Scoring

    • Updates

  • EPIC and ACLU Comments on NIST’s 2023 Digital Identity Draft Guidelines

    Comments of EPIC and the ACLU urging NIST to modify their guidelines on digital identity to reduce collection of biometrics and social security numbers, investigate W3C Verifiable Credentials, limit use of fraud prevention tools, and address equity.

    • Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights

    • Data Protection

    • Government AI Use

    • Government Records & Privacy

    • APA Comments

  • Framing the Risk Management Framework: Actionable Instructions by NIST in The “Measure” Section of the AI RMF

    The Measure Function of the A.I. Risk Management Framework urges companies to build and deploy carefully, centering human experience and a myriad of impact points including environmental and impact on civil liberties and rights. Particularly, it calls for regular testing on validity, reliability, transparency, accountability, safety, security, and fairness. 

    • AI Policy

    • Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights

    • Analysis

Support Our Work

EPIC's work is funded by the support of individuals like you, who allow us to continue to protect privacy, open government, and democratic values in the information age.

Donate
Epic.org | Electronic Privacy Information Center
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

1519 New Hampshire Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20036

Phone number: 202.483.1140

| [email protected]

Sign Up for EPIC Alerts

EPIC uses MailChimp to maintain our mailing list and send newsletters. View MailChimp's privacy policy.
  • Issues
    • AI & Human Rights
    • Consumer Privacy
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Democracy & Free Speech
    • Open Government
    • Privacy Laws
    • Surveillance Oversight
  • Our Work
    • Updates
    • Analysis
    • EPIC Alert
    • Events
    • EPIC Publications
    • Digital Library
  • Media
    • EPIC in the News
    • Press Kit
    • EPIC Statements
    • EPIC Commentaries
  • About
    • EPIC Projects
    • Board & Staff
    • EPIC Advisory Board
    • Careers & Internships
    • Being a Non-profit
    • Cy Pres Awards
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
DONATE Copyright

© 1994 - 2023 EPIC, all rights reserved.