Our Work
Digital Library
Sort By
-
Howard v. Republican National Committee (RNC)
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Robocalls
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Calhoun, et al. v. Google
EPIC’s brief supports the Plaintiffs’ arguments that a jury could find that a reasonable user understood Google’s specific heightened privacy promises contained in the Chrome Privacy Notice to mean that Google would not collect the information it expressly promised not to and therefore that Google did not establish the affirmative defense of consent.
-
Big Data
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Protection
-
Enforcement of Privacy Laws
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
McCarthy v. Amazon
Whether Amazon, the world’s largest online retailer, can be sued under product liability for selling sodium nitrite to minors who used the compound to commit suicide.
-
Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights
-
Big Data
-
Children's Privacy
-
Commercial AI Use
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Protection
-
Web Scraping
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
NetChoice v. Paxton / Moody v. NetChoice
(1) Whether the First Amendment protects every choice a social media company makes as to what user-generated content it hosts and how it arranges that content.
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Protection
-
Enforcement of Privacy Laws
-
Social Media Privacy
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
In re: Casino-Style Games Litigation
Whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which prohibits treating internet companies as the speakers of third-party information, prevents lawsuits against internet companies who sell illegal products provided by third parties on their online marketplaces.
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Michael Terpin v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Cybersecurity
-
Data Protection
-
Data Security
-
Enforcement of Privacy Laws
-
Privacy Laws
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
NetChoice v. Bonta
Whether the First Amendment prohibits a law that requires businesses to offer privacy protections to children.
-
Children's Privacy
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Protection
-
Open Government
-
Privacy Impact Assessments
-
Privacy Laws
-
U.S. State Privacy Laws
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Facebook v. New Jersey
When police want to order a social media company to give them access to a person's future social media messages every 15 minutes for a period of thirty days, can they do so through one search warrant, or do they need to apply for a wiretap order?
-
Communications Privacy
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Privacy Laws
-
Surveillance Oversight
-
U.S. Privacy Laws
-
U.S. State Privacy Laws
-
Wiretapping
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Limon v. Circle K Stores Inc.
Whether state courts should use the more restrictive federal court standing analysis when deciding whether plaintiffs have standing to sue.
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Workplace Privacy
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Peter Maldini v. Marriott International, Inc.
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Cybersecurity
-
Data Security
-
Amicus Briefs
-
Support Our Work
EPIC's work is funded by the support of individuals like you, who allow us to continue to protect privacy, open government, and democratic values in the information age.
Donate