Our Work
Digital Library
Sort By
-
ComputerWorld: ACLU, public defenders push back against Google giving police your mobile data
-
Fourth Amendment
-
Privacy Laws
-
News
-
-
EPIC Will Expand Work on Privacy and Tech Oversight in 2023
For nearly thirty years, EPIC has been fighting to secure the fundamental right to privacy for all, and the fight has never been more important. 2022 was a momentous year that brought new threats—in particular, the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs, which undid 50 years of precedent protecting the constitutional right to privacy—but also hope for the future. In 2023, EPIC will work to establish strong, comprehensive privacy and digital civil rights across the United States; we will help to develop new fairness and accountability mechanisms to ensure that AI and automated decision-making systems do not exacerbate inequities and discrimination; and we will work to ensure that intelligence and law enforcement surveillance programs are subject to robust oversight.
-
Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Privacy Laws
-
Surveillance Oversight
-
Analysis
-
-
EPIC Urges Colorado Supreme Court to Rule Reverse Keyword Warrants are Unconstitutional, Points Toward Effects on Abortion Rights
-
Access to Information
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Democracy & Free Speech
-
Fourth Amendment
-
Privacy Laws
-
Web Scraping
-
Updates
-
-
Seymour v. Colorado
Whether reverse keyword search warrants violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Colorado state constitution.
-
Access to Information
-
Democracy & Free Speech
-
Fourth Amendment
-
Privacy Laws
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
EPIC Submits Comments to Strengthen Consumer Privacy in Colorado Privacy Rulemaking
-
Data Protection
-
Privacy Laws
-
U.S. State Privacy Laws
-
Updates
-
-
EPIC Comments to the Colorado Department of Law
-
Privacy Laws
-
Comments
-
-
EPIC, EFF, and CDT to New Jersey Supreme Court: Don’t Let Police Sleight-of-Hand Avoid Wiretap Requirements
-
Communications Privacy
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Privacy Laws
-
Surveillance Oversight
-
U.S. Privacy Laws
-
Wiretapping
-
Updates
-
-
EPIC Urges FTC to Regulate Surveillance Tech Companies Using Police as Promoters
-
Big Data
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Fourth Amendment
-
Privacy in Public
-
Privacy Laws
-
Surveillance Oversight
-
Updates
-
-
Facebook v. New Jersey
When police want to order a social media company to give them access to a person's future social media messages every 15 minutes for a period of thirty days, can they do so through one search warrant, or do they need to apply for a wiretap order?
-
Communications Privacy
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Privacy Laws
-
Surveillance Oversight
-
U.S. Privacy Laws
-
U.S. State Privacy Laws
-
Wiretapping
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
EPIC Comments on FTC Advanced Notice of Proposed Trade Regulation Rule on Use of Reviews and Endorsements
-
Big Data
-
Competition and Privacy
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Fourth Amendment
-
Privacy in Public
-
Privacy Laws
-
Surveillance Oversight
-
APA Comments
-

Support Our Work
EPIC's work is funded by the support of individuals like you, who allow us to continue to protect privacy, open government, and democratic values in the information age.
Donate