EPIC Alert 20.16
=======================================================================
E P I C A l e r t
=======================================================================
Volume 20.16 August 14, 2013
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Published by the
Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)
Washington, D.C.
http://www.epic.org/alert/epic_alert_20.16.html
"Defend Privacy. Support EPIC."
http://epic.org/donate
========================================================================
Table of Contents
========================================================================
[1] Privacy Law Scholars Support EPIC's Supreme Court Petition
[2] President Announces Plan to Address Surveillance Concerns
[3] Administration Argues NSA Domestic Surveillance is Lawful;
President Supports FISA Court Adversary
[4] TSA Conducts Warrantless Searches Outside of Airports
[5] EPIC's Rotenberg: 'Progress at the White House But Surveillance is
Still Unlawful'
[6] News in Brief
[7] EPIC in the News
[8] EPIC Book Review: 'Rise of the Warrior Cop'
[9] Upcoming Conferences and Events
TAKE ACTION: Sign EPIC's Petition Against NSA Domestic Surveillance!
- SIGN the Petition: https://epic.org/NSApetition/
- LEARN More: https://epic.org/privacy/terrorism/fisa/
- SUPPORT EPIC: http://www.epic.org/donate/
========================================================================
[1] Privacy Law Scholars Support EPIC's Supreme Court Petition
========================================================================
Leading US privacy law scholars have filed a series of "friend of the
court" briefs with the US Supreme Court, supporting EPIC's challenge to
the NSA domestic surveillance program. Meanwhile, the US Solicitor
General has asked the Clerk of the Court for more time to respond to
EPIC's petition filed by EPIC.
The first "friend of the court" brief, by privacy and surveillance
law professor Fred Cate, analyzes Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act
and argues that the NSA's bulk collection of telephone metadata is
unlawful. The brief states that "[t]he government's defense of the
Verizon Order reflects a significant rewriting of the law and permits
the illegal construction of a comprehensive database of data about
U.S. persons' communications." The brief explains that the program:
1) does not meet the strict legal standard of the statute's text; 2)
is contrary to the Executive Order governing intelligence operations,
and 3) violates provisions of the Patriot Act that safeguard First
Amendment-protected speech.
The second brief, written by law professors Laura Donohue and Erwin
Chemerinsky and joined by Former Vice President Walter Mondale,
former Senator Gary Hart, and members of the 1970's Church Committee,
and submitted by constitutional law expert Erwin Chemerinsky and 28
other law professors, outlines the history of NSA domestic surveillance
conducted under the guise of foreign intelligence programs. The brief
explains that "illegal activities, abuse of authority, and violations
of privacy uncovered by the [Church] Committee spurred Congress to pass
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act," which prevents intelligence
agencies from using foreign intelligence authority to justify domestic
surveillance.
The third brief was filed by a group of constitutional scholars at the
Cato Institute, including James Harper and Professor Randy Barnett of
Georgetown University,argues that collection of domestic telephone
records is both unlawful under the FISA and unconstitutional under the
Fourth Amendment. The Cato brief states that the Verizon order is
exactly the type of "general warrant" the Fourth Amendment was designed
to prevent, and that the Supreme Court's 2012 ruling in United States v.
Jones demonstrates that "EPIC has a legal and constitutional interest
in data about its telephone calls."
The fourth brief was written by two preeminent scholars of the federal
courts. Professors James E. Pfander and Steven I. Vladeck argued that
the Court has jurisdiction to hear the case and the authority to grant
EPIC's petition. Pfander and Vladeck maintain that " the writ of mandamus
"would be in aid of the Court's appellate jurisdiction"; that "adequate
relief for [EPIC's] claims cannot be obtained in any other form or from
any other court"; that EPIC clearly has Article III standing to
challenge the unlawful order because EPIC's own telephone records are
being collected.
The Clerk of the Court granted the Solicitor General's motion for an
extension, and the new deadline for a government response to EPIC's
petition is September 11, 2013.
Indiana University: Brief by F. Cate on Section 215 (Aug. 9, 2013)
http://www.law.indiana.edu/front/etc/section-215-amicus-8.pdf
Syracuse U.: Brief from L. Donohue, E. Chemerinsky et al. (Aug. 2013)
http://insct.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/EPIC-Amicus-Brief.pdf
CATO Institute: Brief by J. Harper and R. Barnett (Aug. 2013)
http://epic.org/privacy/nsa/in-re-epic/Cato-Amicus.pdf
EPIC: Brief from J. Pfander and S. Vladeck et al. (Aug. 2013)
http://epic.org/privacy/nsa/in-re-epic/Pfander-Vladeck-Amici-Brief.pdf
EPIC: In re EPIC - NSA Telephone Records Surveillance
http://epic.org/privacy/nsa/in-re-epic/default.html
========================================================================
[2] President Announces Plan to Address Surveillance Concerns
========================================================================
In remarks at the White House August 9, President Obama addressed
growing public concern about the scope of the NSA's surveillance
activities. Following a series of meetings that occurred earlier in
the week with civil liberties organizations, tech companies, and
Congressional leaders, the President announced "four specific steps" to
move the debate forward.
First, the President said he would work with Congress to reform Section
215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, the provision of law that the Administration
cites as authority to collect all telephone records of American
citizens. EPIC has challenged this interpretation of the law in a case
currently pending before the US Supreme Court. The President said he
would work with Congress to "put in place greater oversight, greater
transparency, and constraints on the use of this authority."
Second, the President said he would work to improve the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court, which reviews intelligence-gathering
activities under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The
President said he would support the establishment of an "independent
voice in appropriate cases" that can challenge the government's position
in an adversarial process.
Third, the President said he would support greater transparency of the
programs run by the intelligence community; the establishment of a
website; and the designation of a chief privacy officer at the National
Security Agency. In 2010 comments to the FISA Court, EPIC proposed the
creation of a website to provide more information about the intelligence
community's activities, and recommended the routine publication of the
court's opinions and more extensive reporting on the court's activities,
including an annual report.
Fourth, the President said he would form "a high-level group of outside
experts to review our entire intelligence and communications
technologies." The President said the group would provide an interim
report in 60 days and a final debate by the end of 2013 so that the
Administration can move forward "with a better understanding of how
these programs impact our security, our privacy, and our foreign
policy."
The President closed his remarks by stating, "[W]e're going to resolve
our differences . . . through vigorous public debate, guided by our
Constitution, with reverence for our history as a nation of laws, and
with respect for the facts."
President Obama: Remarks at Press Conference re: NSA (Aug. 9, 2013)
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/PresidentialNewsConference103
EPIC: In re EPIC, US No. 13-58 (Jul. 11, 2013)
http://epic.org/privacy/nsa/in-re-epic/
EPIC: House Testimony on FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (May 31, 2012)
http://epic.org/redirect/061912-epic-fisa-amdt-statement.html
EPIC: Comments on "Proposed Amended FISC Rules" (Oct. 4, 2010)
http://www.epic.org/redirect/100610EPICFISCCom.html
========================================================================
[3] Administration Argues NSA Domestic Surveillance is Lawful;
President Supports FISA Court Adversary
========================================================================
The Obama Administration has released a white paper outlining the
legal arguments for why the USA PATRIOT Act's Section 215 authorizes
the NSA to collect the metadata on all Americans' telephone records.
The document argues that if only a few records turn out to be
"relevant" to an investigation, then the NSA can collect every record
in the database, but the White House lacks strong legal authority for
this novel proposition.
"[C]ourts have held that the relevance standard permits requests for
the production of entire repositories of records, even when any
particular record is unlikely to directly bear on the matter being
investigated, because searching the entire repository is the only
feasible means to locate the critical documents," the paper says.
None of the cases the government cites, however, authorized data
collection on the same scale as the NSA's telephone surveillance
program. Each of the government's cited authorities involved a
pre-existing, targeted investigation of a single entity, not the
prospective collection of every telephone record of every American.
The government also released an NSA memo discussing the agency's
role in the Intelligence Community and its surveillance programs.
The agency represents that it "touches" roughly 29 petabytes per day
of Internet traffic. The document discusses the NSA's authority under
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the Patriot Act, and
executive orders. NSA serves the Intelligence Community "by engaging in
the collection of 'signals intelligence,' which, quite literally, is
the production of foreign intelligence through the collection,
processing, and analysis of communications or other data, passed or
accessible by radio, wire, or other electromagnetic means." The memo
also addresses the NSA's collaboration with corporations and foreign
governments.
At an August 9 press conference, President Obama outlined proposals
that would address some, but not all, problems with the domestic
surveillance programs. He supported the appointment of a special
advocate to argue in favor of civil liberties before the FISA Court.
"[T]o build greater confidence, I think we should consider some
additional changes to the [FISA Court]," he said. "One of the concerns
that people raise is that a judge reviewing a request from the
government to conduct programmatic surveillance only hears one side of
the story, may tilt it too far in favor of security, may not pay enough
attention to liberty." Nevertheless, the President stood by the NSA's
bulk collection of Americans' communications data.
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence also recently
released the "Primary Order" from the FISA Court, which describes the
scope of the NSA's data analysis for the telephone surveillance program.
The order details the procedures the NSA is expected to follow when
reviewing data, but is heavily redacted, for example: ""The specifics
of the automated query process, as described in the [redacted]
Declaration, are as follows: [three paragraphs redacted]." The order
does not include any legal analysis from the court about how the
surveillance laws should be applied in practice. The government
simultaneously released past reports on the NSA's domestic
surveillance programs.
The White House: White Paper on NSA Telephony Metadata (Aug. 9, 2013)
http://epic.org/redirects/081313-whitehouse-nsa-whitepaper.html
NSA: "Missions, Authorities, Oversight and Partnerships" (Aug. 9, 2013)
http://epic.org/redirects/081313-nsa-memo.html
C-SPAN: Pres. Obama's Press Conference on Surveillance (Aug. 9, 2013)
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/PresidentialNewsConference103
ODNI: Primary Order from the FISA Court (Apr. 25, 2013)
http://www.dni.gov/files/documents/PrimaryOrder_Collection_215.pdf
ODNI: Press Release on Past NSA Surveillance Programs (Jul. 31, 2013)
http://epic.org/redirect/081313-odni-past-surveillance.html
EPIC: In re EPIC - NSA Telephone Records Surveillance
http://epic.org/privacy/nsa/in-re-epic/default.html
========================================================================
[4] TSA Conducts Warrantless Searches Outside of Airports
========================================================================
The Transportation Security Administration has expanded the "Visible
Intermodal Prevention and Response" (VIPR) program to perform
warrantless searches at various locations, including festivals,
sporting events, and bus stations. The VIPR teams are intended to
enhance "deterrence and detection," but their effectiveness has been
called into question.
A 2012 US House of Representatives report on the TSA highlighted the
lack of performance metrics for expensive programs like VIPR. According
to the report, the VIPR program, which began in 2005 and currently
consists of 37 VIPR teams and a $100 million budget, still lacks
adequate performance metrics, despite the fact that the "TSA agreed
that performance measures needed to be developed for VIPR teams, and
pledged to develop such metrics, including measuring interagency
collaboration and stakeholder views on the effectiveness of VIPR
teams." The report also notes that the lack of performance metrics for
an expensive TSA program is not unique to the VIPR program.
Members of Congress have opposed the VIPR searches and called for
the program's end. Representative Scott Garrett (R-NJ) introduced the
"Freedom to Travel Act of 2013" in June. The bill would eliminate the
VIPR teams and searches by the TSA outside of airports.
In 2012, EPIC prevailed in a lawsuit against the TSA that revealed the
agency's plan to deploy body scanners outside airports, including at
bus and train stations. In 2011, EPIC also prevailed in a challenge the
use of x-ray body scanners in airports. As a result, TSA had to
perform a public rulemaking on the use of body scanners, and has
removed the revealing backscatter machines from airports.
TSA: "Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response" (VIPR)
http://epic.org/redirect/081313-tsa-vipr.html
US House: "Rebuilding TSA into a Smarter, Leaner Organization" (Sep. 2012)
http://epic.org/redirect/081313-house-report-tsa.html
Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) "Freedom of Travel Act of 2013" (Jun. 28, 2013)
http://epic.org/redirect/081313-freedom-travel-2013.html
GAO: Report on US Security Programs (Mar. 2012)
http://www.gao.gov/assets/590/589587.pdf
EPIC: EPIC v. DHS Order (Sep. 9, 2012)
http://epic.org/foia/dhs/EPIC-v-DHS-Fees-Ruling-09-14-12.pdf
========================================================================
[5] Rotenberg: 'Progress at the White House But Surveillance is
Still Unlawful'
========================================================================
President Obama should be credited for the concrete proposals he put
forward August 9 to address public concerns about the scope of the
NSA's surveillance programs. After first trying to assure the American
public that "we are not listening in on everyone's phone calls," the
President began the real work of reforming the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act, or FISA, a broken legal framework in clear need of
repair.
Many of the President's proposals reflected recommendations that EPIC
and others have advocated in testimony before Congress and in comments
directly to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Disregarding
the White House's willingness to take on board these recommendations
would be counterproductive. Specifically, the publication of FISC
opinions, the appointment of a public interest advocate to challenge
the government's case before the FISC, and more routine public
reporting about the scope of the FISC's activities would do much to
strengthen oversight and restore public trust.
Still, it must be said clearly and directly that the NSA's current
surveillance activities - the domestic phone record collection program
in particular - are unlawful and must be suspended. This is the basis
of EPIC's challenge to the US Supreme Court and we believe that if the
Court agrees to hear our case we will prevail on the central legal
issue. It simply cannot be the case that all of the records of all of
the telephone customers in the US are "relevant" to an "authorized
investigation" by the Department of Justice. No act of Congress
provided such expansive data collection authority. The Justice
Department finally has put forward its justification for this
interpretation of law. But much like the defense of the George W.
Bush Administration's warrantless wiretapping program, the case is not
persuasive - and one more reason why the Supreme Court should resolve
this dispute.
The President's speech also did not go far enough to address the
legitimate concerns of non-US citizens over the NSA's surveillance
practices, or the uneasy alliance between the US government and US
Internet firms. It is hardly reassuring to those outside of the US
to be told repeatedly that the legality of the US surveillance
activities are measured solely by their impact on US citizens. Even
acknowledging that most countries engage in surveillance and that
countries have legitimate national security interests, democratic
governments still must provide a legal basis for their actions against
others. And it is not too much to expect that the United States would
recognize, as other countries have also, that privacy is a fundamental
human right that can unite countries rather than set them apart.
In pursuing the dialogue over surveillance, the President likes to
remind his audience that the US has established important systems of
oversight and can afford a vigorous public debate. That is true, and
last week the President's statements lent further support to the
proposition. But there is more that needs to be done. A process is now
underway. Leaders in both parties must now demonstrate their commitment
to a security policy that is bounded both by the Constitution and the
rule of law.
-- Marc Rotenberg
========================================================================
[6] News in Brief
========================================================================
EPIC Submits Eighth Petition to NSA to Suspend Domestic Surveillance
EPIC, joined by over 3,000 members of the public, leading privacy
experts, and journalists, has petitioned the National Security Agency
for the eighth time, urging the suspension of the NSA domestic
surveillance program pending public comments. EPIC first petitioned the
agency on June 17, 2013. Because the NSA has failed to respond, EPIC
has renewed the petition on a weekly basis. EPIC's petition states,
"NSA's collection of domestic communications contravenes the First
and Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and violates
several federal privacy laws, including the Privacy Act of 1974, and
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 as amended." The
petition further states that the NSA's domestic surveillance
"substantively affects the public to a degree sufficient to implicate
the policy interests" that require public comment, and that "NSA's
collection of domestic communications absent the opportunity for public
comment is unlawful." By law, the NSA is required to respond. EPIC
intends to renew its request for a public rulemaking each week until
the NSA responds.
EPIC: NSA Petition (June 17, 2013)
http://epic.org/NSApetition/
EPIC: In re EPIC - NSA Telephone Records Surveillance
https://epic.org/privacy/nsa/in-re-epic/default.html
Court Requires Driver Data Resellers to 'Exercise Reasonable Care'
The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled in Gordon v.
Softech Intl. that under the Driver Privacy Protection Act data
brokers may be liable for the use of personal information that they
obtain from DMVs and then sell to others. "Based on the language of
the statute, its structure, and its legislative history, we conclude
that the DPPA imposes a duty on resellers to exercise reasonable care
in responding to requests for personal information drawn from motor
vehicle records," the federal appeals court announced. The court
cited the sensitivity of the personal information available through
motor vehicle records, including social security numbers, medical or
disability information, and home addresses. In reversing the lower
court's decision, the appeals court said, "It is not enough for a
reseller to simply provide a 'drop down list' of permissible
purposes." EPIC filed a "friend of the court" brief in the case,
arguing that "Strict liability for the improper sale of driver records
is necessary to satisfy the statutory purpose of the DPPA" and to
"ensure that resellers take precautions to avoid impermissible uses" of
sensitive personal data.
Second Circuit Court: Decision in Gordon v. Softech (Jul. 31, 2013)
http://epic.org/redirect/081313-gordon-decision.html
EPIC: Gordon v. Softech Int'l, Inc.
http://epic.org/amicus/dppa/softech/
EPIC: "Friend of the Court" Brief in Gordon v. Softech (Jun. 15, 2012)
http://epic.org/amicus/dppa/softech/EPIC-Amicus-Brief.pdf
EPIC: Driver Privacy Protection Act
http://epic.org/privacy/drivers/
National Institutes of Health Protects Genetic Privacy of HeLa Cells
The National Institutes of Health has agreed to safeguard Henrietta
Lacks' family genetic privacy while still allowing research on the
famous HeLa cells. During her fight against an aggressive form of
cervical cancer in the 1950s, Henrietta Lacks' cells were given to
scientists, without her consent, for experimentation because of their
ability to replicate in a lab setting. Her cells are still used today
for scientific research. In 2012, EPIC submitted comments to the
Department of Health and Human Services, arguing for stronger privacy
protections for genetic data. In early 2013, EPIC filed a "friend of
the court" brief with the US Supreme Court in the case Maryland v.
King, arguing for limited law enforcement access to DNA.
NIH: Press Release on HeLa Genome Agreement (Aug. 7, 2013)
http://www.nih.gov/about/director/statement-hela-08072013.htm
Wellcome UK: Background on HeLa Cells
http://epic.org/redirect/081313-background-hela.html
EPIC: Comments to DHHS on Genetic Data Privacy (May 25, 2012)
http://epic.org/privacy/genetic/EPIC-Human-Gene-Seq-Data-Comments.pdf
EPIC: "Friend of the Court" Brief in Maryland v. King (Feb. 1, 2013)
http://epic.org/amicus/dna-act/maryland/EPIC-Amicus-Brief.pdf
EPIC: Maryland v. King
http://epic.org/amicus/dna-act/maryland/
EPIC: Genetic Privacy
http://epic.org/privacy/genetic/
EPIC Supports International Principles for Privacy Protection
EPIC has joined with nearly 200 leading human rights organizations and
privacy experts in support of the "International Principles on the
Application of Human Rights to Communications Surveillance." The
Principles were adopted in response to growing concern over the
surveillance of Internet communications by governments and private
companies. Among the key principles in the framework document are
Necessity, Adequacy, Proportionality, Competent Judicial Authority, Due
Process, User Notification, Transparency, Public Oversight, and
Safeguards Against Illegitimate Access. EPIC is a consistent supporter
of EU and international privacy laws and frameworks.
"International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to
Communications Surveillance" (Jul. 10, 2013)
https://en.necessaryandproportionate.org/text
EPIC: EU Data Protection Directive
http://epic.org/privacy/intl/eu_data_protection_directive.html
========================================================================
[7] EPIC in the News
========================================================================
"Video: "Common Core Moms discuss EPIC Lawsuit against the Department
of Education [Interview with EPIC Administrative Law Counsel Khaliah
Barnes]." Constitution Party of Florida, August 3, 2013.
http://www.cpflorida.com/2013/08/03/common-core-moms-discuss-epic-
lawsuit-against-the-department-of-education/
"T.S.A. Expands Duties Beyond Airport Security." The New York Times,
August 5, 2013.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/06/us/tsa-expands-duties-beyond-
airport-security.html?hp&_r=0
WBUR's "On Point": "NSA Chief Speaks At Black Hat [Interview with EPIC
Appellate Advocacy Counsel Alan Butler." August 1, 2013.
http://onpoint.wbur.org/2013/08/01/nsa-alexander-black-hat
"Diane Ravitch: 3 Dubious Uses of Technology in Schools." Scientific
American, July 31, 2013.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=diane-ravitch-3-
dubious-uses-technology-in-schools
"Feds asked to investigate privacy issues in rapper app." Consumer
Affairs, July 30, 2013.
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/feds-asked-to-investigate-
privacy-issues-in-rapper-app-073013.html
For More EPIC in the News: http://epic.org/news/epic_in_news.html
========================================================================
[8] EPIC Book Review: 'Rise of the Warrior Cop'
========================================================================
"Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of America's Police
Forces," Radley Balko
http://epic.org/redirect/081313-rise-warrior-cop-balko.html
The power behind Radley Balko's new book, "Rise of the Warrior Cop,"
lies in its narratives. In story after horrific story, Balko fills in
the history of US law enforcement from the ratification of the
Constitution through the present day. Rather than focus on any single
piece of the story, however, Balko's narrative shifts from the
decision-makers in Washington, DC, to the results of those decisions,
played out in raids, stand-offs, and shifts in policy at police
departments throughout the country.
"Warrior Cop" first introduces us to the Third and Fourth Amendments of
the US Constitution, the primary limits on police power. Balko then
uses the Amendments to introduce to the Castle Doctrine, the general
warrant, and the ill-advised Cushing Doctrine, which allowed the
President to deploy military troops to enforce federal law, and which
was mostly overturned by a law known as the Posse Comitatus Act.
Balko then wades through a history of US policing itself, briefly
touching on the period between the Colonial era and the 1960s, then
using the next 250 pages as an in-depth tour of police history from the
1960s through November 2012. This time period follows the development,
and wide-scale use, of SWAT teams, the policies that spurned and
perpetuated the drug wars, and the hyper-militarization of local police
departments through the use of military training and equipment. Balko
ends his book with ideas for reform, including the need to re-evaluate
the drug war, halt "mission creep" and the expansion of SWAT teams, and
increase transparency and accountability in enforcement practices.
Though the book occasionally suffers from a complicated storyline that
could be helped by a tighter narrative, Balko succeeds in delivering a
brilliantly detailed treatise on the history of American law
enforcement. Most startling, perhaps, is how Balko demonstrates the
erosion of constitutional rights, particularly how law enforcement
apparatus approaches the Fourth Amendment as a hindrance to be overcome;
'Warrior Cop' includes many stories of "raids" on the homes of innocent
Americans, either due error or misinformation.
The single hole in Balko's story is his underrepresentation of the
increasing role played by surveillance equipment. Throughout 'Warrior
Cop,' Balko explains how local police departments wind up in possession
of military equipment: tanks, armor, grenade launchers, and other gear.
But some equipment isn't only for combat; Balko does discuss, at one
point, the proliferation of drones as tools for police surveillance,
particularly how drones are being deployed in 90% of the largest US
largest cities in America, and that they are not infallible: one
crashed into a DHS-funded armored personnel carrier.
'Rise of the Warrior Cop' is well-researched, well-written, and
attention-grabbing, Balko succeeds in both educating and entertaining
the reader; I found myself reading passages out loud to those around me,
in awe and, often, in disgust. As Balko is careful to note, this is not
an anti-cop polemic, but a study that highlights the failures of the
law enforcement system as a whole "There's been barely any opposition
or concern from anyone in Congress, any governor, or any mayor of a
sizable city," says Balko. "That, more than anything, is what needs
to change."
-- Amie Stepanovich
======================================
EPIC Bookstore:
"Litigation Under the Federal Open Government Laws 2010," edited by
Harry A. Hammitt, Marc Rotenberg, John A. Verdi, Ginger McCall, and Mark
S. Zaid (EPIC 2010). Price: $75.
http://epic.org/bookstore/foia2010/
Litigation Under the Federal Open Government Laws is the most
comprehensive, authoritative discussion of the federal open access laws.
This updated version includes new material regarding President Obama's
2009 memo on Open Government, Attorney General Holder's March 2009 memo
on FOIA Guidance, and the new executive order on declassification. The
standard reference work includes in-depth analysis of litigation under:
the Freedom of Information Act, the Privacy Act, the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, and the Government in the Sunshine Act. The fully updated
2010 volume is the 25th edition of the manual that lawyers, journalists
and researchers have relied on for more than 25 years.
================================
"Information Privacy Law: Cases and Materials, Second Edition" Daniel J.
Solove, Marc Rotenberg, and Paul Schwartz. (Aspen 2005). Price: $98.
http://www.epic.org/redirect/aspen_ipl_casebook.html
This clear, comprehensive introduction to the field of information
privacy law allows instructors to enliven their teaching of fundamental
concepts by addressing both enduring and emerging controversies. The
Second Edition addresses numerous rapidly developing areas of privacy
law, including: identity theft, government data mining and electronic
surveillance law, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act,
intelligence sharing, RFID tags, GPS, spyware, web bugs, and more.
Information Privacy Law, Second Edition, builds a cohesive foundation
for an exciting course in this rapidly evolving area of law.
================================
"Privacy & Human Rights 2006: An International Survey of Privacy Laws
and Developments" (EPIC 2007). Price: $75.
http://www.epic.org/phr06/
This annual report by EPIC and Privacy International provides an
overview of key privacy topics and reviews the state of privacy in over
75 countries around the world. The report outlines legal protections,
new challenges, and important issues and events relating to privacy.
Privacy & Human Rights 2006 is the most comprehensive report on privacy
and data protection ever published.
================================
"The Public Voice WSIS Sourcebook: Perspectives on the World Summit on
the Information Society" (EPIC 2004). Price: $40.
http://www.epic.org/bookstore/pvsourcebook
This resource promotes a dialogue on the issues, the outcomes, and the
process of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). This
reference guide provides the official UN documents, regional and
issue-oriented perspectives, and recommendations and proposals for
future action, as well as a useful list of resources and contacts for
individuals and organizations that wish to become more involved in the
WSIS process.
================================
"The Privacy Law Sourcebook 2004: United States Law, International Law,
and Recent Developments," Marc Rotenberg, editor (EPIC 2005). Price:
$40.
http://www.epic.org/bookstore/pls2004/
The Privacy Law Sourcebook, which has been called the "Physician's Desk
Reference" of the privacy world, is the leading resource for students,
attorneys, researchers, and journalists interested in pursuing privacy
law in the United States and around the world. It includes the full
texts of major privacy laws and directives such as the Fair Credit
Reporting Act, the Privacy Act, and the OECD Privacy Guidelines, as well
as an up-to-date section on recent developments. New materials include
the APEC Privacy Framework, the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act, and the
CAN-SPAM Act.
================================
"Filters and Freedom 2.0: Free Speech Perspectives on Internet Content
Controls" (EPIC 2001). Price: $20.
http://www.epic.org/bookstore/filters2.0
A collection of essays, studies, and critiques of Internet content
filtering. These papers are instrumental in explaining why filtering
threatens free expression.
================================
EPIC publications and other books on privacy, open government, free
expression, and constitutional values can be ordered at:
EPIC Bookstore: http://www.epic.org/bookstore
================================
EPIC also publishes EPIC FOIA Notes, which provides brief summaries of
interesting documents obtained from government agencies under the
Freedom of Information Act.
Subscribe to EPIC FOIA Notes at:
http://mailman.epic.org/mailman/listinfo/foia_notes
=======================================================================
[9] Upcoming Conferences and Events
=======================================================================
"The Snitch in Your Pocket," with EPIC Appellate Advocacy Counsel Alan
Butler. Chautauqua, NY, 17 July 2013. For More Information:
http://www.ciweb.org/storage/downloads/SpecialStudies.pdf.
The Public Voice Conference, Warsaw, Poland, September 2013. For More
Information: http://thepublicvoice.org.
=======================================================================
Join EPIC on Facebook and Twitter
=======================================================================
Join the Electronic Privacy Information Center on Facebook and Twitter:
http://facebook.com/epicprivacy
http://epic.org/facebook
http://twitter.com/epicprivacy
Join us on Twitter for #privchat, Tuesdays, 11:00am ET.
Start a discussion on privacy. Let us know your thoughts. Stay up to
date with EPIC's events. Support EPIC.
=======================================================================
Privacy Policy
=======================================================================
The EPIC Alert mailing list is used only to mail the EPIC Alert and to
send notices about EPIC activities. We do not sell, rent or share our
mailing list. We also intend to challenge any subpoena or other legal
process seeking access to our mailing list. We do not enhance (link to
other databases) our mailing list or require your actual name.
In the event you wish to subscribe or unsubscribe your e-mail address
from this list, please follow the above instructions under "subscription
information."
=======================================================================
About EPIC
=======================================================================
The Electronic Privacy Information Center is a public interest research
center in Washington, DC. It was established in 1994 to focus public
attention on emerging privacy issues such as the Clipper Chip, the
Digital Telephony proposal, national ID cards, medical record privacy,
and the collection and sale of personal information. EPIC publishes the
EPIC Alert, pursues Freedom of Information Act litigation, and conducts
policy research. For more information, see http://www.epic.org or write
EPIC, 1718 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20009. +1 202
483 1140 (tel), +1 202 483 1248 (fax).
=======================================================================
Donate to EPIC
=======================================================================
If you'd like to support the work of the Electronic Privacy Information
Center, contributions are welcome and fully tax-deductible. Checks
should be made out to "EPIC" and sent to 1718 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite
200, Washington, DC 20009. Or you can contribute online at:
http://www.epic.org/donate
Your contributions will help support Freedom of Information Act and
First Amendment litigation, strong and effective advocacy for the right
of privacy and efforts to oppose government and private-sector
infringement on constitutional values.
Thank you for your support.
=======================================================================
Subscription Information
=======================================================================
Subscribe/unsubscribe via web interface:
http://mailman.epic.org/mailman/listinfo/epic_news
Back issues are available at: http://www.epic.org/alert
The EPIC Alert displays best in a fixed-width font, such as Courier.
------------------------- END EPIC Alert 20.16------------------------