US Supreme Court
-
Supreme Court Avoids Major Section 230 Ruling in Case About Digital Platforms Recommending Terrorist Content
The Supreme Court has declined to address whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a law that encourages tech companies to moderate content on their platforms, immunizes companies like Google and Twitter from lawsuits alleging that their recommendation algorithms promoted terrorist activity. In a pair of decisions released today—Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh.
-
Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights
-
Commercial AI Use
-
Democracy & Free Speech
-
Online Harassment
-
Updates
-
-
EPIC Joins Consumer Groups in Urging Supreme Court to Reject Attack on the CFPB
-
Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights
-
Commercial AI Use
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Brokers
-
Data Protection
-
Enforcement of Privacy Laws
-
Screening & Scoring
-
Updates
-
-
Gonzalez v. Google
-
Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights
-
Democracy & Free Speech
-
Privacy Laws
-
Amicus Brief
-
-
EPIC to Supreme Court: Internet Companies Should Face Suits for Their Harmful Conduct
-
Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights
-
Democracy & Free Speech
-
Enforcement of Privacy Laws
-
Social Media Privacy
-
Updates
-
-
EPIC Joins Brennan Center, Others Urging Supreme Court to Allow Lawsuits by Unconstitutionally Surveilled Citizens
-
Privacy Laws
-
Surveillance Oversight
-
Updates
-
-
Tuggle v. United States
Whether the Fourth Amendment protects against warrantless long-term, continuous, and covert pole camera surveillance of the outside of a person’s home.
-
Fourth Amendment
-
Privacy Laws
-
Surveillance Oversight
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
EPIC & Coalition Tell Supreme Court to Hear Warrantless Pole Camera Surveillance Case
-
Fourth Amendment
-
Privacy Laws
-
Surveillance Oversight
-
Updates
-
-
TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez
Whether plaintiffs in FCRA and other privacy suits can establish standing based on a violation of their statutory rights.
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Facebook v. Duguid
Whether the Telephone Consumer Protection Act prohibits use of mass telephone dialing systems that dial numbers from a database.
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Robocalls
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Van Buren v. United States
Whether a police officer "exceeds authorized access" under the Computer Fraud & Abuse Act when they access personal information in a government database for an improper purpose.
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Government Databases
-
Surveillance Oversight
-
Web Scraping
-
Amicus Briefs
-