Article III Standing
-
EPIC and EFF Urge California Supreme Court to Review Lower Court Opinion Barring Plaintiffs’ Privacy Suit
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Workplace Privacy
-
Updates
-
-
Limon v. Circle K Stores Inc.
Whether state courts should use the more restrictive federal court standing analysis when deciding whether plaintiffs have standing to sue.
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Workplace Privacy
-
Amicus Brief
-
-
EPIC and EFF Urge Appeals Court to Recognize that Customers May Sue When Companies’ Lax Data Security Practices Result in Data Breaches
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Cybersecurity
-
Data Security
-
-
EPIC & Public Justice Urge Appeals Court to Confirm That Plaintiffs May Sue When Companies Use Their Identities to Advertise
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Cybersecurity
-
Data Security
-
Updates
-
-
Peter Maldini v. Marriott International, Inc.
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Cybersecurity
-
Data Security
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Martinez v. ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc.
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
EPIC Urges Senators to Question Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on Key Privacy & Open Government Issues
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Fourth Amendment
-
Freedom of Information Act
-
Open Government
-
Privacy Laws
-
Updates
-
-
EPIC Letter to Senate Judiciary Committee re: Nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the U.S. Supreme Court
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Fourth Amendment
-
Freedom of Information Act
-
Open Government
-
Privacy Laws
-
Statements
-
-
Article III Standing
-
Article III Standing
-
-
Supreme Court Limits Standing to Sue in Credit Reporting Case
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Protection
-
Enforcement of Privacy Laws
-
Updates
-