Article III Standing

EPIC and EFF Urge California Supreme Court to Review Lower Court Opinion Barring Plaintiffs’ Privacy Suit

• Article III Standing

• Consumer Privacy

• Workplace Privacy

• Updates

Limon v. Circle K Stores Inc.

Whether state courts should use the more restrictive federal court standing analysis when deciding whether plaintiffs have standing to sue.

• Article III Standing

• Consumer Privacy

• Workplace Privacy

• Amicus Brief

EPIC and EFF Urge Appeals Court to Recognize that Customers May Sue When Companies’ Lax Data Security Practices Result in Data Breaches

• Article III Standing

• Consumer Privacy

• Cybersecurity

• Data Security

EPIC & Public Justice Urge Appeals Court to Confirm That Plaintiffs May Sue When Companies Use Their Identities to Advertise

• Article III Standing

• Consumer Privacy

• Cybersecurity

• Data Security

• Updates

Peter Maldini v. Marriott International, Inc.

• Article III Standing

• Consumer Privacy

• Cybersecurity

• Data Security

• Amicus Briefs

Martinez v. ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc.

• Article III Standing

• Consumer Privacy

• Amicus Briefs

EPIC Urges Senators to Question Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on Key Privacy & Open Government Issues

• Article III Standing

• Consumer Privacy

• Fourth Amendment

• Freedom of Information Act

• Open Government

• Privacy Laws

• Updates

EPIC Letter to Senate Judiciary Committee re: Nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the U.S. Supreme Court

• Article III Standing

• Consumer Privacy

• Fourth Amendment

• Freedom of Information Act

• Open Government

• Privacy Laws

• Statements

Article III Standing

• Article III Standing

Supreme Court Limits Standing to Sue in Credit Reporting Case

• Article III Standing

• Consumer Privacy

• Data Protection

• Enforcement of Privacy Laws

• Updates