Our Work
Digital Library
Sort By
-
Howard v. Republican National Committee (RNC)
Do Multimedia Messaging Service (“MMS”) messages containing a video and sent without the recipient’s consent constitute a violation of the artificial or prerecorded voice provisions of the TCPA?
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Robocalls
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Calhoun, et al. v. Google
EPIC’s brief supports the Plaintiffs’ arguments that a jury could find that a reasonable user understood Google’s specific heightened privacy promises contained in the Chrome Privacy Notice to mean that Google would not collect the information it expressly promised not to and therefore that Google did not establish the affirmative defense of consent.
-
Big Data
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Protection
-
Enforcement of Privacy Laws
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
McCarthy v. Amazon
Whether Amazon, the world’s largest online retailer, can be sued under product liability for selling sodium nitrite to minors who used the compound to commit suicide.
-
Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights
-
Big Data
-
Children's Privacy
-
Commercial AI Use
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Protection
-
Web Scraping
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
NetChoice v. Paxton / Moody v. NetChoice
(1) Whether the First Amendment protects every choice a social media company makes as to what user-generated content it hosts and how it arranges that content.
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Protection
-
Enforcement of Privacy Laws
-
Social Media Privacy
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
In re: Casino-Style Games Litigation
Whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which prohibits treating internet companies as the speakers of third-party information, prevents lawsuits against internet companies who sell illegal products provided by third parties on their online marketplaces.
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Bride et al. v. Yolo Technologies, Inc.
Whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act prohibits (1) misrepresentation claims against internet companies who, after claiming in their terms of service that they would ban and reveal the identities of users who cyberbullied others, then refused to do so, and (2) products liability claims against the same defendants for designing an allegedly unsafe messaging product that allowed users to send anonymous, abusive messages to teens.
-
Data Protection
-
Democracy & Free Speech
-
Privacy Laws
-
U.S. Privacy Laws
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Michael Terpin v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Cybersecurity
-
Data Protection
-
Data Security
-
Enforcement of Privacy Laws
-
Privacy Laws
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Public Interest Legal Foundation v. Bellows
Whether the National Voting Rights Act prohibiting state laws that limit how people can access and use voters' personal information.
-
Democracy & Free Speech
-
Privacy Laws
-
U.S. State Privacy Laws
-
Voter Privacy
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
NetChoice v. Bonta
Whether the First Amendment prohibits a law that requires businesses to offer privacy protections to children.
-
Children's Privacy
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Protection
-
Open Government
-
Privacy Impact Assessments
-
Privacy Laws
-
U.S. State Privacy Laws
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
O.W. v. Carr et al.
-
Data Protection
-
Fourth Amendment
-
Privacy Laws
-
Student Privacy
-
Amicus Briefs
-
Support Our Work
EPIC's work is funded by the support of individuals like you, who allow us to continue to protect privacy, open government, and democratic values in the information age.
Donate