Our Work
Digital Library
Sort By
-
EPIC and EFF Urge California Supreme Court to Review Lower Court Opinion Barring Plaintiffs’ Privacy Suit
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Workplace Privacy
-
Updates
-
-
Limon v. Circle K Stores Inc.
Whether state courts should use the more restrictive federal court standing analysis when deciding whether plaintiffs have standing to sue.
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Workplace Privacy
-
Amicus Brief
-
-
EPIC and EFF Urge Appeals Court to Recognize that Customers May Sue When Companies’ Lax Data Security Practices Result in Data Breaches
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Cybersecurity
-
Data Security
-
-
EPIC & Public Justice Urge Appeals Court to Confirm That Plaintiffs May Sue When Companies Use Their Identities to Advertise
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Cybersecurity
-
Data Security
-
Updates
-
-
Peter Maldini v. Marriott International, Inc.
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Cybersecurity
-
Data Security
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
Martinez v. ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc.
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Amicus Briefs
-
-
EPIC Urges Senators to Question Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on Key Privacy & Open Government Issues
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Fourth Amendment
-
Freedom of Information Act
-
Open Government
-
Privacy Laws
-
Updates
-
-
EPIC Letter to Senate Judiciary Committee re: Nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the U.S. Supreme Court
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Fourth Amendment
-
Freedom of Information Act
-
Open Government
-
Privacy Laws
-
Statements
-
-
Article III Standing
-
Article III Standing
-
-
Supreme Court Limits Standing to Sue in Credit Reporting Case
-
Article III Standing
-
Consumer Privacy
-
Data Protection
-
Enforcement of Privacy Laws
-
Updates
-

Support Our Work
EPIC's work is funded by the support of individuals like you, who allow us to continue to protect privacy, open government, and democratic values in the information age.
Donate